[ncc-services-wg] Re: [members-discuss] idea Christian 'wiwi' Wittenhorst
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] RE: [members-discuss] idea Christian 'wiwi' Wittenhorst
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] AW: [members-discuss] idea Christian 'wiwi' Wittenhorst
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Simon Lockhart
s.lockhart at cablecomnetworking.co.uk
Wed Aug 3 14:21:48 CEST 2011
On Wed Aug 03, 2011 at 01:18:11PM +0100, Erik Bais wrote: > Paying per object does actually reflect somewhat on the amount of > labor/time/effort that the RIPE NCC workforce has to deal with you. Just for clarity, I believe we should be talking about allocations here, not objects in the database. I have 5 or 6 IPv4 allocations from RIPE. Within those, I probably have over 100 assignment objects recorded in the database. I think it would be fair to be charged based on the number of allocations, as each allocation requires time with the RIPE NCC to process the request. Simon ---- If you don't want to receive mails from the RIPE NCC Members Discuss list, please log in to your LIR Portal account at: http://lirportal.ripe.net/ First click on General and then click on Edit. At the bottom of the page you can add or remove addresses.
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] RE: [members-discuss] idea Christian 'wiwi' Wittenhorst
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] AW: [members-discuss] idea Christian 'wiwi' Wittenhorst
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]