[ncc-services-wg] Re: [routing-wg] Analysis of the ‘Maximum Length’ Option in Certification ROAs
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Analysis of the ‘Maximum Length’ Option in Certification ROAs
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Re: [routing-wg] Analysis of the ‘Maximum Length’ Option in Certification ROAs
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Randy Bush
randy at psg.com
Tue Apr 19 21:40:03 CEST 2011
hi alex, one thing that interests me which i did not see in your analysis. or maybe i just need more coffee. how many, what proportion of, bgp announcements were for prefixes longer than the allocation in the roa and were properly described by a max-len? as to your choices, i would go with 1 or 2 (make it a mandatory blank field, forcing the user to make an explicit decision). 3 and 4 are horrible. randy
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Analysis of the ‘Maximum Length’ Option in Certification ROAs
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Re: [routing-wg] Analysis of the ‘Maximum Length’ Option in Certification ROAs
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]