[ncc-services-wg] reverseDNS problem alerts - to be discussed in "Services" or "DNS" WG
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] RIPE NCC statement on changes in the RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2009
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Re: reverseDNS problem alerts - to be discussed in "Services" or "DNS" WG
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet
Woeber at CC.UniVie.ac.at
Tue Nov 18 09:45:53 CET 2008
Dear all,
I am following up internally on a couple of (minor) issues
related to reverse DNS configuration mechanisms.
Amongst others I am looking for clarification regarding:
- misleading(?) text in alert messsages, related to IPv6
- selection of master server to transfer zones from
- loose ends in config automation for legacy address space
What is the appropriate list or WG to raise these issues -
the NCC-Services WG or the DNS WG?
Thanks,
Wilfried
PS: I could certainly take this up privately with the NCC's staff,
but I guess some of these aspects might be of interest to the
community, too.
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] RIPE NCC statement on changes in the RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2009
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Re: reverseDNS problem alerts - to be discussed in "Services" or "DNS" WG
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]