[ncc-services-wg] querying national infrastructure
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] querying national infrastructure
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] RIPE55 Draft Agenda for NCC Service WG
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Carsten Schiefner
ripe-wgs.cs at schiefner.de
Thu Oct 18 13:53:45 CEST 2007
Hi Jim, Jim Reid wrote: > [...] Some clarity is needed here so that everyone knows > what the operating conditions are: ie a statement which makes it clear > that there are no grounds for these sorts of complaints. I guess such constrains could very well go into the DNSMON policy (RIPE-342). I further believe it is defacto handled already this way for the monitored TLDs. > Er, it was me who was recommending that any monitoring would only be > done at the request of the Administration concerned. For some vague > definition of "Administration" which could include the Tier1 registry. I would only see the Tier 1 registry as the requesting entity as it is supposed to act with the consent of the "Administration" anyways. Best, Carsten
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] querying national infrastructure
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] RIPE55 Draft Agenda for NCC Service WG
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]