[ncc-services-wg] querying national infrastructure
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] querying national infrastructure
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] querying national infrastructure
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Niall O'Reilly
Niall.oReilly at ucd.ie
Thu Oct 18 11:45:57 CEST 2007
On 18 Oct 2007, at 08:50, Jim Reid wrote: > [Carsten Schiefner wrote] >> Rather it would only do so at the active and explicit request of >> the respective ENUM Tier 1 registry - which turns your argument >> upside-down IMHO. > > Er, it was me who was recommending that any monitoring would only > be done at the request of the Administration concerned. For some > vague definition of "Administration" which could include the Tier1 > registry. From all of this discussion, I suggest the following three points as a basis for agreement. (1) Clarity on the "service envelope" for DNSMON is desirable; (2) Tier-1 ENUM zones are eligible for monitoring by DNSMON; (3) A request for DNSMON monitoring of a Tier-1 ENUM zone will be accepted from a "responsible party" ("Administration", Tier-1 operator, National Regulator, ...) relevant to the zone in question. I hope this helps. /Niall -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: PGP.sig Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 186 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/ncc-services-wg/attachments/20071018/c64dd77b/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] querying national infrastructure
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] querying national infrastructure
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]