[ncc-services-wg] debate and representation
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Re: Allow DNSMON services to monitor ENUM domains
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] debate and representation
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jim Reid
jim at rfc1035.com
Mon Oct 8 19:44:11 CEST 2007
I am reluctant to send this so Andy can again criticise me for disagreeing. :-) On Oct 8, 2007, at 16:56, Andy Davidson wrote: > You're also an NCC board member, and as such were elected to > represent the views of the membership. Of course Andy. But I would expect the membership elects its board members to do a lot more than just that. For example by exercising their independent judgement in the best interests of the NCC as a whole. > Those views are apparant from the messages sent in response to your > perpetual opposition, and by consistently protesting, you are > failing to represent those views. If the WG declares consensus for the "community view" on this subject, or anything else for that matter, I will of course as a board member do my best to represent those views as far as I am able to. It's not clear we're at that point yet. However I am very disappointed that you seem to be saying I should just shut up and not be entitled to voice my opinions because they happen to disagree with yours. Or that a board member, even when speaking in a personal capacity, cannot contribute to a WG's discussions or policy-making proposals. There's a valid debate to be had on this subject and its wider implications. This WG would be remiss if it did not allow a reasoned, open exchange of views from all sides. I hope we can at least agree on that. :-)
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Re: Allow DNSMON services to monitor ENUM domains
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] debate and representation
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]