[ncc-services-wg] Re: [db-wg] Proposal - Maintaining person, role and domain objects
Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet Woeber at CC.UniVie.ac.at
Wed Jul 11 09:20:28 CEST 2007
Denis Walker wrote: [...] >>1) >>This sentence, and the explanation that follows, implies that exactly >>*two* objects are required here and supported. It should work, even >>for the cases where admin-c: and tech-c: are (to be) different. Just >>double-checking. >> > > > Not quite right. My view is that these two mutually referencing objects > must be the FIRST two in an update message. There can be other objects > in the message also, but unrelated to this 'startup procedure'. > > To avoid over complicating the code we want to keep it simple and only > have 2 objects with the mutual reference for the new creation. If you > want a different admin-c and tech-c in the new mntner, none of which > currently exist, first create the new mntner/person pair using the one > person as both admin-c and tech-c. Then create the second person and > modify the mntner. Yep, that's how I read it, too. And I agree. But it should be made explicit in any documentation that goes with this, that for this case an additional step is necessary. No big deal... Wilfried.