From Niall.oReilly at ucd.ie Wed Oct 4 17:07:30 2006 From: Niall.oReilly at ucd.ie (Niall O'Reilly) Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2006 17:07:30 +0200 Subject: [ncc-services-wg] Re: [enum-wg] Proposal for new org-type In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <9EFEFF72-C371-48B7-85A8-43F63586BE67@ucd.ie> This message has two purposes. It is addressed to the ENUM WG with the purpose of determining consensus in this WG on the proposal from Antoin Verschuren. It is addressed to the DB and NCC-Services WGs as an inter-WG communication to alert these WG's to expect a consensus in the ENUM WG and a request from ENUM WG for related changes to the RIPE database. On 3 Oct 2006, at 10:35, Antoin Verschuren wrote: > In order for ENUM registries to be correctly distinguished in the RIPE > NCC database, I want to propose a new organization type to be used in > the organization object. > > Current organization types are: > IANA > RIR > NIR > LIR > NON-REGISTRY > > I would like this list to be extended with the term REGISTRY. > > I will note the issue tomorow in the ENUM WG, but need consensus to > take > place here, so please comment either here or tomorrow in the ENUM WG > session. On 4 Oct 2006, at 09:47, Antoin Verschuren wrote: > I can live with ENUM-REGISTRY, REGISTRY, OTHER or no org-type at all. > I cannot live with the org-type NON-REGISTRY. During his presentation in the ENUM WG, Antoin Verschuren made the following proposal. > In order for ENUM registries to not be misinterpreted in the RIPE > NCC database, I want to propose to change an organization type to be > used in the organization object. > Current organization types are: > > IANA > > RIR > > NIR > > LIR > > NON-REGISTRY > I would like this NON-REGISTRY to be changed to OTHER. I will declare consensus in the ENUM WG unless objections to Antoin's proposal are posted on the ENUM WG mailing list before 12:00 UTC on Thursday, 18 October 2006. Best regards, Niall O'Reilly Co-Chair, RIPE ENUM Working Group From Antoin.Verschuren at sidn.nl Wed Oct 4 17:20:27 2006 From: Antoin.Verschuren at sidn.nl (Antoin Verschuren) Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 17:20:27 +0200 Subject: [ncc-services-wg] RE: [enum-wg] Proposal for new org-type Message-ID: Niall O'Reilly wrote: > This message has two purposes. > > It is addressed to the ENUM WG with the purpose of determining > consensus in this WG on the proposal from Antoin Verschuren. To let there be no misunderstanding, the final proposal with most consensus so far is: >> In order for ENUM registries to not be misinterpreted in the RIPE >> NCC database, I want to propose to change an organization type to be >> used in the organization object. >> Current organization types are: >> >> IANA >> RIR >> NIR >> LIR >> NON-REGISTRY >> >> I would like this NON-REGISTRY to be changed to OTHER. > > I will declare consensus in the ENUM WG unless objections to Antoin's > proposal are posted on the ENUM WG mailing list before 12:00 UTC on > Thursday, 18 October 2006. Regards, Antoin Verschuren Technical Advisor Policy & Business Development SIDN Utrechtseweg 310 PO Box 5022 6802 EA Arnhem The Netherlands T +31 26 3525510 F +31 26 3525505 M +31 6 23368970 E antoin.verschuren at sidn.nl W http://www.sidn.nl/ From Niall.oReilly at ucd.ie Thu Oct 19 13:21:35 2006 From: Niall.oReilly at ucd.ie (Niall O'Reilly) Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 12:21:35 +0100 Subject: [ncc-services-wg] Re: [enum-wg] Proposal for new org-type In-Reply-To: <9EFEFF72-C371-48B7-85A8-43F63586BE67@ucd.ie> References: <9EFEFF72-C371-48B7-85A8-43F63586BE67@ucd.ie> Message-ID: <386EABC5-487C-4234-BADA-B291DD05B0B0@ucd.ie> On 4 Oct 2006, at 16:07, Niall O'Reilly wrote: > During his presentation in the ENUM WG, Antoin Verschuren made the > following proposal. > >> In order for ENUM registries to not be misinterpreted in the RIPE >> NCC database, I want to propose to change an organization type to be >> used in the organization object. >> Current organization types are: >> >> IANA >> >> RIR >> >> NIR >> >> LIR >> >> NON-REGISTRY >> I would like this NON-REGISTRY to be changed to OTHER. > > I will declare consensus in the ENUM WG unless objections to Antoin's > proposal are posted on the ENUM WG mailing list before 12:00 UTC on > Thursday, 18 October 2006. That was a typo. I'm sorry for the confusion. I should of course have put "12:00 UTC on Thursday, 19 October 2006". As this time has now arrived, and no positive objections to Antoin's proposal have been posted on the ENUM WG mailing list, I therefore now declare consensus in in the ENUM WG in favour of this proposal. On behalf of the ENUM WG, I request the RIPE-NCC to implement Antoin's proposal. I ask the Database and NCC-Services WGs to note this consensus and request the Chairs of these WGs to advise the RIPE-NCC whether there is any reason not to proceed with implementation of this proposal. Best regards, Niall O'Reilly Co-Chair, RIPE ENUM Working Group -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: PGP.sig Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 186 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From Woeber at CC.UniVie.ac.at Thu Oct 19 15:09:58 2006 From: Woeber at CC.UniVie.ac.at (Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet) Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 13:09:58 +0000 Subject: [db-wg] Re: [ncc-services-wg] Re: [enum-wg] Proposal for new org-type In-Reply-To: <386EABC5-487C-4234-BADA-B291DD05B0B0@ucd.ie> References: <9EFEFF72-C371-48B7-85A8-43F63586BE67@ucd.ie> <386EABC5-487C-4234-BADA-B291DD05B0B0@ucd.ie> Message-ID: <45377926.2090706@CC.UniVie.ac.at> thanks for this alert, Niall! Niall O'Reilly wrote: > > On 4 Oct 2006, at 16:07, Niall O'Reilly wrote: > >> During his presentation in the ENUM WG, Antoin Verschuren made the >> following proposal. >> >>> In order for ENUM registries to not be misinterpreted in the RIPE >>> NCC database, I want to propose to change an organization type to be >>> used in the organization object. >>> Current organization types are: >>> >>> IANA >>> >>> RIR >>> >>> NIR >>> >>> LIR >>> >>> NON-REGISTRY >>> I would like this NON-REGISTRY to be changed to OTHER. >> >> >> I will declare consensus in the ENUM WG unless objections to Antoin's >> proposal are posted on the ENUM WG mailing list before 12:00 UTC on >> Thursday, 18 October 2006. > > > That was a typo. I'm sorry for the confusion. > I should of course have put "12:00 UTC on Thursday, 19 October 2006". > > As this time has now arrived, and no positive objections to Antoin's > proposal have been posted on the ENUM WG mailing list, I therefore now > declare consensus in in the ENUM WG in favour of this proposal. > > On behalf of the ENUM WG, I request the RIPE-NCC to implement Antoin's > proposal. > > I ask the Database and NCC-Services WGs to note this consensus and > request the Chairs of these WGs to advise the RIPE-NCC whether there is > any reason not to proceed with implementation of this proposal. I have not heard additional input since the DB-WG meeting on Friday morning, so in accordancve with action [DB-AP53.5 WW144] (1) I herewith ask the RIPE NCC to proceed with implementation. > Best regards, > > Niall O'Reilly > Co-Chair, RIPE ENUM Working Group Best regards, Wilfried. (1) Please see item Y., close to the bottom of http://www.ripe.net/ripe/maillists/archives/db-wg/2006/msg00217.html From Niall.oReilly at ucd.ie Thu Oct 19 20:27:33 2006 From: Niall.oReilly at ucd.ie (Niall O'Reilly) Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 19:27:33 +0100 Subject: [db-wg] Re: [ncc-services-wg] Re: [enum-wg] Proposal for new org-type In-Reply-To: <45377926.2090706@CC.UniVie.ac.at> References: <9EFEFF72-C371-48B7-85A8-43F63586BE67@ucd.ie> <386EABC5-487C-4234-BADA-B291DD05B0B0@ucd.ie> <45377926.2090706@CC.UniVie.ac.at> Message-ID: On 19 Oct 2006, at 14:09, Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet wrote: > thanks for this alert, Niall! [ ... ] > I have not heard additional input since the DB-WG meeting on Friday > morning, > so in accordancve with action [DB-AP53.5 WW144] (1) I herewith ask the > RIPE NCC to proceed with implementation. Thanks for your prompt and helpful response, Wilfried! Best regards, Niall From kurtis at kurtis.pp.se Fri Oct 20 11:57:33 2006 From: kurtis at kurtis.pp.se (Kurt Erik Lindqvist) Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 11:57:33 +0200 Subject: [ncc-services-wg] RIPE 53: Minutes NCC Services WG References: <4535FE1B.5050302@ripe.net> Message-ID: Please find attached the minutes of the last working-group meeting. - kurtis - Begin forwarded message: > > > RIPE 53 NCC Services WG Session > ------------------------------- > > Thursday, October 5th 2006 16:00 - 17:00 > > A. Administrative matters > > Welcome > Chairs: Kurt Erik Lindqvist and Bijal Sanghani > Scribe: Agata Peszkowska RIPE NCC > Distribute participant list > Finalise agenda > Minutes RIPE 52 approved > > > B. RIPE NCC update, Vision and Focus 2007: Proposed changes to > activities in 2007 > Axel Pawlik RIPE NCC > http://www.ripe.net/ripe/meetings/ripe-53/presentations/ > ripe_ncc_vision.pdf > > Axel asked for volunteers for the Task Force? > > Gert Doering, Ruediger Volk and Nigel Titley volunteered. > > Questions/Comments: > > Max Tulyev commented that RIPE NCC should educate ISPs on new > technologies (eg. DNSec, ENUM, IPv6) and their implementation. > > Axel Pawlik agreed that this kind of input can be conceived as > stepping on the toes > of businesses offering such services. > > Lars-Johan Liman agreed. The RIPE NCC should be an organisation > that does things on request of the RIPE Community. It should > nothave its own agenda, pushing advertising and such. > > Max Tulyev stated he was talking about presentations to target > groups and lectures at the > universities. > > Axel commented that the RIPE NCC relies on the LIRs to stimulate > these activities in your areas. The RIPE NCC is awaiting input and > ideas. > > C. Training Services update - Rumy Kanis RIPE NCC > http://www.ripe.net/ripe/meetings/ripe-53/presentations/ > training_services.pdf > > Rumy introduced the Training Services team > > Rumy asked if anyone had visited the E-Learning Centre. Two people > responded that they had. > There were no questions. > > D. Open microphone session > > Kurt Lindqvist strongly encouraged the attendees to participate in > discussions > and come forward with any issues of concern. > > There was a discussion in Database WG about email security. The > RIPE NCC mail servers don't support TLS. Would it be possible for > the RIPE NCC to assess the situation and see whether it can be > enabled? > > Action RIPE NCC: Andrei Robachevsky, RIPE NCC, agreed that the RIPE > NCC would investigate and report back at/by the next RIPE Meeting. > > There was general support for this in the room. > > Max Tulyev proposed that a charging scheme should be implemented > for IPv6 minimum allocation and PI. > > Kurtis Lindqvist advised that this should be brought up in the RIPE > NCC General Meeting discussions. > > Z. AOB > > None. From trudy at ripe.net Tue Oct 24 17:26:31 2006 From: trudy at ripe.net (Trudy Prins) Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 17:26:31 +0200 Subject: [ncc-services-wg] Webquery and Webupdates services were unavailable Message-ID: <453E30A7.6020700@ripe.net> [Apologies for duplicate mails] Dear Colleagues, Between 14:30 - 14:50 (UTC) on Tuesday, 24 October 2006 our Webquery and Webupdates services were unavailable. This problem was due to performance issues on one of our servers and has now been resolved. We apologise for any inconvenience. If you have any questions or concerns regarding this issue, please contact us at: Regards, -- Trudy Prins User Support Coordinator From katie at ripe.net Tue Oct 24 10:49:15 2006 From: katie at ripe.net (Katie Petrusha) Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 10:49:15 +0200 Subject: [ncc-services-wg] ISO Country Code Change Message-ID: <20061024084915.GE29737@ripe.net> [Apologies for duplicate e-mails] Dear Colleagues, The ISO 3166 country codes list has been changed. The previous country code for Serbia and Montenegro (CS) has been replaced with two new country codes: RS - Serbia ME - Montenegro On Friday, 27 October 2006, the RIPE Database software and the LIR Portal will be altered to accept all three codes. The old CS country code will be deprecated at a later date. The full ISO 3166 country code list is available at: ftp://ftp.ripe.net/iso3166-countrycodes.txt http://www.iso.org/iso/en/prods-services/iso3166ma/02iso-3166-code-lists/list-en1.html If you have any questions e-mail us at: ripe-dbm at ripe.net Kind regards, -- Katie Petrusha Software Engineer RIPE NCC