From trudy at ripe.net Thu May 4 11:13:00 2006 From: trudy at ripe.net (Trudy Prins) Date: Thu, 04 May 2006 11:13:00 +0200 Subject: [ncc-services-wg] updated RIPE Whois Database User Manual Message-ID: <4459C59C.3020102@ripe.net> [Apologies for duplicate e-mails] Dear Colleagues, We are pleased to announce the publication of an updated RIPE Whois Database User Manual. ripe-375 RIPE Whois Database User Manual: Getting Started The content has been revised and updated and we have improved the wording to make it clearer. We have also added extra information about 'webupdates'. You can find the document at: http://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/db-start.html Regards, Trudy Prins User Support Coordinator Software Engineering Department RIPE NCC From markguz at ripe.net Tue May 9 12:02:03 2006 From: markguz at ripe.net (Mark Guz) Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 12:02:03 +0200 Subject: [ncc-services-wg] RIPE NCC (AS3333) Network Maintenance Message-ID: <1147168923.5434.46.camel@localhost.localdomain> [Apologies for Duplicates] Dear Colleagues, The RIPE NCC will carry out planned network maintenance tomorrow between 16:00 and 18:00 GMT. During this work, there may be some interruption to our services. We apologise for any inconvenience that this may cause. This work is part of a programme of ongoing network upgrades. If you have any questions about this, please send an e-mail to . Regards -- Mark Guz Senior System/Network Engineer RIPE NCC Singel 258 Amsterdam 1016 AB Tel: +31 (0) 20 535 4444 Fax: +31 (0) 20 535 4445 http://www.ripe.net -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 191 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From trudy at ripe.net Thu May 11 10:02:20 2006 From: trudy at ripe.net (Trudy Prins) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 10:02:20 +0200 Subject: [ncc-services-wg] whois update service was paused Message-ID: <4462EF8C.1050005@ripe.net> [Apologies for duplicate mails] Dear Colleagues, Yesterday, we deployed several bug fixes for the whois server software. The fixes should improve ORGANISATION object name handling. During the work, the whois update service was paused for around two hours. We apologise for the inconvenience. If you have any questions or concerns about this, please e-mail . Regards, Trudy Prins User Support Coordinator Software Engineering Department From trudy at ripe.net Mon May 15 15:09:10 2006 From: trudy at ripe.net (Trudy Prins) Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 15:09:10 +0200 Subject: [ncc-services-wg] Maintenance announcement Message-ID: <44687D76.6020406@ripe.net> [Apologies for duplicate mails] Dear Colleagues, On Thursday, 18 May 2006 the following services will be unavailable from 05:00 - 06:00 GMT: - RIPE Whois Test Database - Internet Registry Information Service (IRIS) Server - Routing Registry Consistency Check (RRCC) Database These services will be unavailable while we perform important server maintenance work. We apologise in advance for any inconvenience. If you have any questions or concerns about this, please e-mail: . Regards, Trudy Prins User Support Coordinator Software Engineering Department From markguz at ripe.net Tue May 16 13:11:59 2006 From: markguz at ripe.net (Mark Guz) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 13:11:59 +0200 Subject: [ncc-services-wg] RIPE NCC Network Maintenance 17th May 2006 Message-ID: <1147777919.6262.26.camel@localhost.localdomain> [ apologies for duplicates ] Dear Colleagues, Tomorrow, 17th May 2006, between 1600 and 1800 GMT, the RIPE NCC will be performing some network maintenance at our office in Amsterdam. This work should have no obvious effect on our network services but if after this maintenance window you experience any problems accessing RIPE NCC services please drop a note to ops at ripe.net Kind Regards -- Mark Guz Senior System/Network Engineer RIPE NCC Singel 258 Amsterdam 1016 AB Tel: +31 (0) 20 535 4444 Fax: +31 (0) 20 535 4445 http://www.ripe.net -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 191 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From trudy at ripe.net Wed May 17 13:03:37 2006 From: trudy at ripe.net (Trudy Prins) Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 13:03:37 +0200 Subject: [ncc-services-wg] LIR Portal Maintenance Message-ID: <446B0309.2020407@ripe.net> [Apologies for duplicate e-mails] Dear Colleagues, On Thursday 18 May, between 07:00 and 08:00 CET, we will carry out maintenance work on the RIPE NCC LIR Portal. Expected downtime is approximately 60 minutes. During this period, the LIR Portal will be unavailable. We apologise for any inconvenience that this may cause. If you have any questions or concerns, please contact:. Regards, Trudy Prins User Support Coordinator Software Engineering Department From Woeber at CC.UniVie.ac.at Wed May 17 15:12:33 2006 From: Woeber at CC.UniVie.ac.at (Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet) Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 13:12:33 +0000 Subject: [ncc-services-wg] Transferring responsibility for PI space from LIRa to LIRb Message-ID: <446B2141.20608@CC.UniVie.ac.at> Does anyone happen to know by heart where I could read up on how to transfer responsibility for PI space from LIR-a (our's) to LIR-b (a recently established one). I am interested in both the "responsibility" apect i.e. DB and NCC Hostmaster's stuff as well as the billing stuff (i.e. size category). TIA, Wilfried. From gstammw at gmx.net Wed May 17 15:20:05 2006 From: gstammw at gmx.net (Gunther Stammwitz) Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 15:20:05 +0200 Subject: AW: [ncc-services-wg] Transferring responsibility for PI space from LIRa to LIRb In-Reply-To: <446B2141.20608@CC.UniVie.ac.at> Message-ID: <20060517131749.BDE89330094@server.edu-search.de> Hello Wilfried, I don't think there is an official procedure but try contacting the hostmaster and ask for the transfer. We have done this once and all that was necessary was an email with some sort of acknowledgement from the receiving LIR. Gunther > -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- > Von: ncc-services-wg-admin at ripe.net > [mailto:ncc-services-wg-admin at ripe.net] Im Auftrag von > Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 17. Mai 2006 15:13 > An: ncc-services-wg at ripe.net > Betreff: [ncc-services-wg] Transferring responsibility for PI > space from LIRa to LIRb > > Does anyone happen to know by heart where I could read up on > how to transfer responsibility for PI space from LIR-a > (our's) to LIR-b (a recently established one). > > I am interested in both the "responsibility" apect i.e. DB > and NCC Hostmaster's stuff as well as the billing stuff (i.e. > size category). > > TIA, Wilfried. > > From president at ukraine.su Wed May 17 16:15:56 2006 From: president at ukraine.su (Max Tulyev) Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 18:15:56 +0400 Subject: [ncc-services-wg] Transferring responsibility for PI space from LIRa to LIRb In-Reply-To: <446B2141.20608@CC.UniVie.ac.at> References: <446B2141.20608@CC.UniVie.ac.at> Message-ID: <446B301C.1010104@ukraine.su> Hi! LIR interacts with PI space and ASes only once, at the registration stage. After objects are registered, LIR don't support it anymore. PI/AS is billed only once, so there is no need to transfer billing stuff. At the database it is not a good idea to let LIR to be maintaier of your PI/AS, so use your mntner to maintain it in DB. Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet wrote: > Does anyone happen to know by heart where I could read up on > how to transfer responsibility for PI space from LIR-a (our's) > to LIR-b (a recently established one). > > I am interested in both the "responsibility" apect i.e. DB and NCC > Hostmaster's stuff as well as the billing stuff (i.e. size category). > > TIA, Wilfried. > -- WBR, Maxim V. Tulyev (MT6561-RIPE, 2:463/253 at FIDO) From gstammw at gmx.net Wed May 17 17:17:24 2006 From: gstammw at gmx.net (Gunther Stammwitz) Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 17:17:24 +0200 Subject: AW: [ncc-services-wg] Transferring responsibility for PI space from LIRa to LIRb In-Reply-To: <446B301C.1010104@ukraine.su> Message-ID: <20060517151512.859803300D2@server.edu-search.de> > -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- > Von: ncc-services-wg-admin at ripe.net > [mailto:ncc-services-wg-admin at ripe.net] Im Auftrag von Max Tulyev > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 17. Mai 2006 16:16 > An: ncc-services-wg at ripe.net > Betreff: Re: [ncc-services-wg] Transferring responsibility > for PI space from LIRa to LIRb > > Hi! > > LIR interacts with PI space and ASes only once, at the > registration stage. After objects are registered, LIR don't > support it anymore. > > PI/AS is billed only once, so there is no need to transfer > billing stuff. That is not correct. Your RIPE billing-score does also contain the elder assignments although they are weakened by some sort of time factor. If you're losing a customer who's using PI-space try to get rid of the space on your lir-account and move it to the customer's new lir. Gunther > > At the database it is not a good idea to let LIR to be > maintaier of your PI/AS, so use your mntner to maintain it in DB. > From gert at space.net Wed May 17 17:20:16 2006 From: gert at space.net (Gert Doering) Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 17:20:16 +0200 Subject: [ncc-services-wg] Transferring responsibility for PI space from LIRa to LIRb In-Reply-To: <20060517151512.859803300D2@server.edu-search.de> References: <446B301C.1010104@ukraine.su> <20060517151512.859803300D2@server.edu-search.de> Message-ID: <20060517152016.GL3510@Space.Net> Hi, On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 05:17:24PM +0200, Gunther Stammwitz wrote: > > PI/AS is billed only once, so there is no need to transfer > > billing stuff. > That is not correct. Your RIPE billing-score does also contain the elder > assignments although they are weakened by some sort of time factor. True for PA, but not true for PI. Read it up in the "NCC charging scheme" document, ripe-360.txt. Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 92315 SpaceNet AG Mail: netmaster at Space.Net Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Tel : +49-89-32356-0 D- 80807 Muenchen Fax : +49-89-32356-234 From slz at baycix.de Wed May 17 17:42:48 2006 From: slz at baycix.de (Sascha Lenz) Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 17:42:48 +0200 Subject: [ncc-services-wg] Transferring responsibility for PI space from LIRa to LIRb In-Reply-To: <20060517152016.GL3510@Space.Net> References: <446B301C.1010104@ukraine.su> <20060517151512.859803300D2@server.edu-search.de> <20060517152016.GL3510@Space.Net> Message-ID: <446B4478.80304@baycix.de> Hi, Gert Doering wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 05:17:24PM +0200, Gunther Stammwitz wrote: >>> PI/AS is billed only once, so there is no need to transfer >>> billing stuff. >> That is not correct. Your RIPE billing-score does also contain the elder >> assignments although they are weakened by some sort of time factor. > > True for PA, but not true for PI. Read it up in the "NCC charging scheme" > document, ripe-360.txt. uhm, i think it's not true for pre-Oct2004 PI, but true for newer Assignments? >From ripe-360: -----8<----- Note: AS Numbers, PI IPv4 and IPv6 special purpose assignments issued before 1 October 2004 will NOT count toward the 2006 billing score. -----8<----- So recent PI Assignments should count for the membership category points this year and in the years coming. ...as far as i understand ripe-360 - or do i miss something? I have no post-Oct2004 Assignments so i can't do a reality-check on it ;-) -- ======================================================================== = Sascha Lenz SLZ-RIPE slz at baycix.de = = Network Operations = = BayCIX GmbH, Landshut * PGP public Key on demand * = ======================================================================== From slz at baycix.de Wed May 17 17:48:14 2006 From: slz at baycix.de (Sascha Lenz) Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 17:48:14 +0200 Subject: [ncc-services-wg] Transferring responsibility for PI space from LIRa to LIRb In-Reply-To: <446B4478.80304@baycix.de> References: <446B301C.1010104@ukraine.su> <20060517151512.859803300D2@server.edu-search.de> <20060517152016.GL3510@Space.Net> <446B4478.80304@baycix.de> Message-ID: <446B45BE.9010003@baycix.de> Hi, ..hm on a second thought... Sascha Lenz wrote: > Hi, > > Gert Doering wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 05:17:24PM +0200, Gunther Stammwitz wrote: >>>> PI/AS is billed only once, so there is no need to transfer >>>> billing stuff. >>> That is not correct. Your RIPE billing-score does also contain the elder >>> assignments although they are weakened by some sort of time factor. >> True for PA, but not true for PI. Read it up in the "NCC charging scheme" >> document, ripe-360.txt. > > uhm, i think it's not true for pre-Oct2004 PI, but true for newer > Assignments? > > From ripe-360: > -----8<----- > Note: AS Numbers, PI IPv4 and IPv6 special purpose assignments issued > before 1 October 2004 will NOT count toward the 2006 billing score. > -----8<----- > > So recent PI Assignments should count for the membership category points > this year and in the years coming. > > ...as far as i understand ripe-360 - or do i miss something? I have no > post-Oct2004 Assignments so i can't do a reality-check on it ;-) > ...probably the Charging Scheme next year excludes Pre-Oct2005 PI/AS Assignments so we're back to "one time fee" But that's not really clear from the document itself, just by reading the previous, obsoleted charging scheme documents (ripe-330)... -- ======================================================================== = Sascha Lenz SLZ-RIPE slz at baycix.de = = Network Operations = = BayCIX GmbH, Landshut * PGP public Key on demand * = ======================================================================== From gert at space.net Wed May 17 17:51:59 2006 From: gert at space.net (Gert Doering) Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 17:51:59 +0200 Subject: [ncc-services-wg] Transferring responsibility for PI space from LIRa to LIRb In-Reply-To: <446B4478.80304@baycix.de> References: <446B301C.1010104@ukraine.su> <20060517151512.859803300D2@server.edu-search.de> <20060517152016.GL3510@Space.Net> <446B4478.80304@baycix.de> Message-ID: <20060517155159.GN3510@Space.Net> Hi, On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 05:42:48PM +0200, Sascha Lenz wrote: > uhm, i think it's not true for pre-Oct2004 PI, but true for newer > Assignments? [..] > So recent PI Assignments should count for the membership category points > this year and in the years coming. Indeed, you're right. I was sure I had a reference somewhere that PI (and AS numbers) only count for the year of allocation/assignment, but that must have been an earlier document. OTOH the charging scheme for 2007 hasn't yet been approved by the AGM anyway, so it's hard to make any definite statements about it. Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 92315 SpaceNet AG Mail: netmaster at Space.Net Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Tel : +49-89-32356-0 D- 80807 Muenchen Fax : +49-89-32356-234 From president at ukraine.su Wed May 17 18:01:57 2006 From: president at ukraine.su (Max Tulyev) Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 20:01:57 +0400 Subject: [ncc-services-wg] Transferring responsibility for PI space from LIRa to LIRb In-Reply-To: <20060517155159.GN3510@Space.Net> References: <446B301C.1010104@ukraine.su> <20060517151512.859803300D2@server.edu-search.de> <20060517152016.GL3510@Space.Net> <446B4478.80304@baycix.de> <20060517155159.GN3510@Space.Net> Message-ID: <446B48F5.80001@ukraine.su> Hi, Can it be RIPE NCC remembers ALL assignment from for example 1992 in 2007 billing scheme? ;) Gert Doering wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 05:42:48PM +0200, Sascha Lenz wrote: > >>uhm, i think it's not true for pre-Oct2004 PI, but true for newer >>Assignments? > > [..] > >>So recent PI Assignments should count for the membership category points >>this year and in the years coming. > > > Indeed, you're right. I was sure I had a reference somewhere that PI > (and AS numbers) only count for the year of allocation/assignment, but > that must have been an earlier document. > > OTOH the charging scheme for 2007 hasn't yet been approved by the AGM > anyway, so it's hard to make any definite statements about it. > > Gert Doering > -- NetMaster -- WBR, Maxim V. Tulyev (MT6561-RIPE, 2:463/253 at FIDO) From Woeber at CC.UniVie.ac.at Thu May 18 00:02:33 2006 From: Woeber at CC.UniVie.ac.at (Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet) Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 22:02:33 +0000 Subject: [ncc-services-wg] Transferring responsibility for PI space from LIRa to LIRb In-Reply-To: <446B45BE.9010003@baycix.de> References: <446B301C.1010104@ukraine.su> <20060517151512.859803300D2@server.edu-search.de> <20060517152016.GL3510@Space.Net> <446B4478.80304@baycix.de> <446B45BE.9010003@baycix.de> Message-ID: <446B9D79.1040400@CC.UniVie.ac.at> Sascha Lenz wrote: > Hi, OMG, that's an interesting way of hiding it ;-) > ...probably the Charging Scheme next year excludes Pre-Oct2005 PI/AS > Assignments so we're back to "one time fee" > > But that's not really clear from the document itself, just by reading > the previous, obsoleted charging scheme documents (ripe-330)... I kept re-reading and searching this text, but was too stupid to succeed in reverse engineering that clause. Sigh. I'll talk to Jochem to try and get it re-worded - unless it is done "on purpose". Thanks to all who contributed! Wilfried. From jochem at ripe.net Thu May 18 11:19:09 2006 From: jochem at ripe.net (Jochem de Ruig) Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 11:19:09 +0200 Subject: [ncc-services-wg] Transferring responsibility for PI space from LIRa to LIRb In-Reply-To: <446B9D79.1040400@CC.UniVie.ac.at> References: <446B45BE.9010003@baycix.de> <446B301C.1010104@ukraine.su> <20060517151512.859803300D2@server.edu-search.de> <20060517152016.GL3510@Space.Net> <446B4478.80304@baycix.de> <446B45BE.9010003@baycix.de> Message-ID: <5.2.1.1.2.20060518101846.0443e890@mailhost.ripe.net> Dear Wilfried and all, When making a transfer of one or more allocation or assignment from one registry to another we charge a one-time administration fee, currently EUR 1,000. This fee is also charged when one registry takes over another registry. The scoring of IPv4 PI space in the billing score of a registry counts at the moment as one time score taken into account to determine the billing category of a registry. Only PI space assigned in the last 12 months is taken into account. Historically this has changed in 2004 we introduced a new charging scheme structure including IPv6, ASNs and IPv4 PI space into the billing score algorithm. IPv4 PI and PA blocks scored identical, all allocations / assignments were taken into account including blocks "older" than 1 year. Of course the relevance towards a registry score of PI blocks was small as the PI blocks are generally smaller than PA. We received several comments from registries who argued that the PI blocks they were scored for were used by customers who did not do any business anymore with them. They perceived it as unfair to be scored for a resource they had nothing to do with. In 2005 we amended the billing score so that only the PI blocks from the last 12 months were taken into account (a one time score towards the billing score) and the weight of the score of PI blocks was increased. In 2006 we maintained the same scoring and only changed the wording (which still needs a bit of improvement as already pointed out). For more information see the Charging Schemes 2005 - 2006: ftp://ftp.ripe.net/ripe/docs/ripe-293.pdf ftp://ftp.ripe.net/ripe/docs/ripe-330.pdf ftp://ftp.ripe.net/ripe/docs/ripe-360.pdf So I will use this opportunity to ask you for feedback on the scoring of PI space so that we can take the feedback into account for the charging scheme 2007. Regards, Jochem de Ruig RIPE NCC At 10:02 PM 5/17/2006 +0000, Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet wrote: >Sascha Lenz wrote: > > > Hi, > >OMG, that's an interesting way of hiding it ;-) > > > ...probably the Charging Scheme next year excludes Pre-Oct2005 PI/AS > > Assignments so we're back to "one time fee" > > > > But that's not really clear from the document itself, just by reading > > the previous, obsoleted charging scheme documents (ripe-330)... > >I kept re-reading and searching this text, but was too stupid to succeed >in reverse engineering that clause. Sigh. > >I'll talk to Jochem to try and get it re-worded - unless it is done >"on purpose". > >Thanks to all who contributed! >Wilfried. From andrei at ripe.net Mon May 22 17:31:38 2006 From: andrei at ripe.net (Andrei Robachevsky) Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 17:31:38 +0200 Subject: [ncc-services-wg] Re: Deprecation of ip6.int scheduled for 1 June 2006 In-Reply-To: <4416BA2F.8080809@ripe.net> References: <4416BA2F.8080809@ripe.net> Message-ID: <4471D95A.7010300@ripe.net> Dear Colleagues, This is a reminder that from 1 June 2006, reverse delegations in the ip6.int DNS tree corresponding to IPv6 address space allocated by the RIPE NCC will no longer be supported. On 1 June 2006, RIPE NCC delegations will be deleted from the ip6.int zone. Following this we will remove the zones from the authoritative servers and delete the corresponding DOMAIN objects in the RIPE Whois Database. The maintainers of the DOMAIN objects to be deleted will also receive individual notifications 1 week prior to the deletion. This is being coordinated with other RIRs and is based on an IETF Best Current Practice document (RFC 4159). Regards, Andrei Robachevsky Chief Technical Officer RIPE NCC On 14 March 2006 Andrei Robachevsky wrote: > Dear Colleagues > > In August 2005, the IETF published RFC 4159: 'Deprecation of "ip6.int"', > as a Best Current Practice document. The RFC noted that maintenance of > "ip6.int" is no longer needed and called on the Regional Internet > Registries (RIRs) to decide when to stop providing support for the > domain. The RIRs have jointly agreed to do this on 1 June 2006. > > There will be a short presentation on this at the RIPE 52 Meeting in > Istanbul. You can find more information about this meeting at: > > http://www.ripe.net/ripe/meetings/ripe-52/index.html > > Regards > > Andrei Robachevsky > Chief Technical Officer > RIPE NCC > > > > > From andrei at ripe.net Mon May 22 17:31:38 2006 From: andrei at ripe.net (Andrei Robachevsky) Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 17:31:38 +0200 Subject: [ncc-services-wg] [local-ir]Re: Deprecation of ip6.int scheduled for 1 June 2006 In-Reply-To: <4416BA2F.8080809@ripe.net> References: <4416BA2F.8080809@ripe.net> Message-ID: <4471D95A.7010300@ripe.net> Dear Colleagues, This is a reminder that from 1 June 2006, reverse delegations in the ip6.int DNS tree corresponding to IPv6 address space allocated by the RIPE NCC will no longer be supported. On 1 June 2006, RIPE NCC delegations will be deleted from the ip6.int zone. Following this we will remove the zones from the authoritative servers and delete the corresponding DOMAIN objects in the RIPE Whois Database. The maintainers of the DOMAIN objects to be deleted will also receive individual notifications 1 week prior to the deletion. This is being coordinated with other RIRs and is based on an IETF Best Current Practice document (RFC 4159). Regards, Andrei Robachevsky Chief Technical Officer RIPE NCC On 14 March 2006 Andrei Robachevsky wrote: > Dear Colleagues > > In August 2005, the IETF published RFC 4159: 'Deprecation of "ip6.int"', > as a Best Current Practice document. The RFC noted that maintenance of > "ip6.int" is no longer needed and called on the Regional Internet > Registries (RIRs) to decide when to stop providing support for the > domain. The RIRs have jointly agreed to do this on 1 June 2006. > > There will be a short presentation on this at the RIPE 52 Meeting in > Istanbul. You can find more information about this meeting at: > > http://www.ripe.net/ripe/meetings/ripe-52/index.html > > Regards > > Andrei Robachevsky > Chief Technical Officer > RIPE NCC > > > > > From feedback at ripe.net Wed May 31 12:27:15 2006 From: feedback at ripe.net (Paul Rendek) Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 12:27:15 +0200 Subject: [ncc-services-wg] RIPE 52 Report available Message-ID: <447D6F83.8080701@ripe.net> [Apologies for duplicate e-mails] Dear Colleagues, The RIPE 52 Meeting Report is now online at: http://www.ripe.net/ripe/meetings/ripe-52/report.html Regards, Paul Rendek Head of Member Services & Communications RIPE NCC From briddle at ripe.net Wed May 31 15:12:26 2006 From: briddle at ripe.net (Brian Riddle) Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 15:12:26 +0200 Subject: [ncc-services-wg] Problems with mail to lsd@ripe.net Message-ID: <447D963A.5000609@ripe.net> [Apologies for duplicates] Dear Colleagues, Since yesterday, there have been problems with e-mails sent to lsd at ripe.net. An engineer is working to fix this. We are not aware of problems with any other RIPE NCC e-mail addresses. If you have recently sent mail to lsd at ripe.net, please send it again to ncc at ripe.net. We apologise for any inconvenience this may cause. Kind regards, Brian Riddle IT Manager OPS Dept. RIPE NCC From briddle at ripe.net Wed May 31 15:21:39 2006 From: briddle at ripe.net (Brian Riddle) Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 15:21:39 +0200 Subject: [ncc-services-wg] Problems with mail to lsd@ripe.net Message-ID: <447D9863.3080908@ripe.net> [Apologies for duplicates] Dear Colleagues, Since yesterday, there have been problems with e-mails sent to lsd at ripe.net. An engineer is working to fix this. We are not aware of problems with any other RIPE NCC e-mail addresses. If you have recently sent mail to lsd at ripe.net, please send it again to ncc at ripe.net. We apologise for any inconvenience this may cause. Kind regards, Brian Riddle IT Manager OPS Dept. RIPE NCC