[ncc-services-wg] Improved Secure Communication for Registration Services (RS) Mailboxes
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Improved Secure Communication for Registration Services (RS) Mailboxes
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Improved Secure Communication for Registration Services (RS) Mailboxes
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Fri Feb 27 13:15:40 CET 2004
Hi, On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 11:22:37AM +0100, Måns Nilsson KTHNOC wrote: > > As others have noted, we can support both X.509 and PGP. We can also > > support *only* PGP, although I think because of #2, above, this is not a > > good solution. > > I would argue that it is the other way around; given the forced choice of > "only one" the broadest support exists for PGP. I don't see anyone talking about "only one". Why are you worried? (If someone proposed abandoning PGP, I would be one of the loudest voices opposing it) Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 58081 (57882) SpaceNet AG Mail: netmaster at Space.Net Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Tel : +49-89-32356-0 80807 Muenchen Fax : +49-89-32356-299
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Improved Secure Communication for Registration Services (RS) Mailboxes
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Improved Secure Communication for Registration Services (RS) Mailboxes
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]