[ncc-services-wg] Improved Secure Communication for Registration Services (RS) Mailboxes
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Improved Secure Communication for Registration Services (RS) Mailboxes
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Improved Secure Communication for Registration Services (RS) Mailboxes
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Dmitry Morozovsky
marck at rinet.ru
Wed Feb 25 19:34:13 CET 2004
On Wed, 25 Feb 2004, Randy Bush wrote: [snip] RB> > I say NO to X.509. RB> RB> i would ammend slightly. the rirs provide us service. some of us RB> find pgp easier to deploy and use. some will provide x.509 easier. RB> so the rirs accepting *both* would be good. RB> RB> randy, a pgp kinda guy who also uses x.509 occasionally I could not agree more! ;-) /me, biased the same ;-) Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck at rinet.ru *** ------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Improved Secure Communication for Registration Services (RS) Mailboxes
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Improved Secure Communication for Registration Services (RS) Mailboxes
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]