[ncc-services-wg] New service: ip2asn
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] New service: ip2asn
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] New service: ip2asn
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hank Nussbacher
hank at att.net.il
Thu Sep 25 15:19:22 CEST 2003
At 11:14 AM 25-09-03 +0200, Henk Uijterwaal (RIPE-NCC) wrote: >For starters, I disagree with the statement that this is a new service >that was not approved by anybody beforehand. The TT-WG was set up for Huh? I made that statement? I said "Another new service I'd like to discuss is the TTM ip2asn service as presented at RIPE-46: http://www.ripe.net/ripe/meetings/ripe-46/presentations/ripe46-tt-as-traceroutes.pdf" I think you are reading things that are not quite there. > >From your previous postings, I have understood that you do not like the >current model where every WG can ask the RIPE NCC for specific actions. >However, this was the procedure at the time. Even with the advent of the >NCC-services WG it appears to us as the correct procedure for something >like this, because it is germane to the TT-WG and does not involve >a significant amount of resources. From: http://www.ripe.net/ripe/wg/ncc-services/index.html#charter The aim of this WG would be to discuss at least the following: · performance of existing services · introduction of new services, new tools · an ongoing evaluation of the RIPE NCC Activity Plan Is it the RIPE NCC's view that this charter is no longer valid and the text for bullet #2 should instead be "introduction of new services, new tools that involve a significant amount of resources"? >------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >Henk Uijterwaal Email: henk.uijterwaal at ripe.net >RIPE Network Coordination Centre WWW: http://www.ripe.net/home/henk >P.O.Box 10096 Singel 258 Phone: +31.20.5354414 >1001 EB Amsterdam 1016 AB Amsterdam Fax: +31.20.5354445 >The Netherlands The Netherlands Mobile: +31.6.55861746 >------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >That problem that we weren't having yesterday, is it better? (Big ISP NOC) -Hank
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] New service: ip2asn
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] New service: ip2asn
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]