[ncc-services-wg] Re: [db-wg] The New "organisation object" Proposal
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Re: [db-wg] The New "organisation object" Proposal
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Re: [db-wg] The New "organisation object" Proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Engin Gunduz
engin at ripe.net
Tue Sep 2 11:58:11 CEST 2003
Hi Joao, On 2003-08-25 14:58:47 +0200, Joao Damas wrote: [...] > > using the "org-name:" attribute of the object. The user can specify > >the > > letter combination he/she prefers. For example if the user wants > >TTR as the > > letter combination, in the organisation ID, then ORG-AUTO-1TTR > >should be > > put into "organisation:" attribute during the creation of the object. > > Yes, I read it, what I mean is whether you would consider eliminating > the part about choosing letters. This is only an identifier and it > would be good if people could think about it as just that, with no > naming implications. As the first thought, I liked the idea of eliminating the part about choosing letters. However there can be a valid use case for it: the user might want to have a specific letter combination other than the software assigns, because the latter might mean something "inappropriate" in some language by coincidence. -engin -- Engin Gunduz RIPE NCC Database Group
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Re: [db-wg] The New "organisation object" Proposal
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Re: [db-wg] The New "organisation object" Proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]