[ncc-services-wg] Reverse DNS Restructuring Project

• Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Reverse DNS Restructuring Project
• Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Reverse DNS Restructuring Project

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Daniel Roesen dr at cluenet.de
Thu Oct 2 14:19:28 CEST 2003

On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 02:16:46PM +0200, Peter Koch wrote:
> > - lesser delegations in the RIPE-operated zone files
> 
> Not really, since a delegation on a /16 boundary even now precludes any
> further delegation of "names" below that /16 out of the parenting /8.
> Ignoring the objects is just a consequence of how DNS works.

You're right of course. No coffee yet. *sigh*


Best regards,
Daniel

• Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Reverse DNS Restructuring Project
• Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Reverse DNS Restructuring Project

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ ncc-services-wg Archives ]