[ncc-services-wg] RIPE tasks
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] RIPE tasks
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] RIPE tasks
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Kurt Erik Lindqvist
kurtis at kurtis.pp.se
Fri Aug 22 16:38:46 CEST 2003
>> Are you also saying that having to have the AGM vote is a problem? In >> that case how would you else want to do it? Voting anytime through out >> the year if enough people called for a vote? That would make it more >> or less impossible to make or follow a budget in any reasonable way. > > I do not believe that the use of the AGM is appropriate for the "big > switch" > being used to approve a proposed budget that included 100% of > projects. The > budget needs approval, but it appears to much "yes or no". There is no > consultation - formal, bot mailing list chatter - on what projects are > approved for inclusion into said budget approval. I don't to objections preceding the discussions of the budget decisions, on the contrary - that is the idea with this WG. However, the decision needs to be taken by the NCC membership alone, and not in a public forum. This is the AGM. Best regards, - kurtis -
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] RIPE tasks
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] RIPE tasks
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]