[ncc-services-wg] RIPE tasks
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] RIPE tasks
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] RIPE tasks
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hank Nussbacher
hank at att.net.il
Thu Aug 21 09:40:25 CEST 2003
At 03:09 PM 20-08-03 -0400, Bovio at aol.com wrote: >In a message dated 20/08/03 17:34:19 W. Europe Daylight Time, >kurtis at kurtis.pp.se writes: >Personal attendance is a problem and is one of the issues that came out >of the survey. From what I understand easier proxy voting is being >worked on as well as on-line voting. Someone from RIPE NCC board or the >RIPE NCC can probably give you more details. > >Folks, >Indeed the board has been exploring how to allow as many members as >possible to vote. I am afraid our legal counsel advised us that electronic >voting is not legal in the Netherlands, and the current proxy mechanism is >the only viable form. Well that more or less seals our fate since e-voting is out and proxy voting is limited to 2% of membership. From: http://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/articles-association.html Article 16, paragraph 4: "A proxy may not cast more than two percent (2%) of the total number of possible votes of all members of the association whether or not present or represented at the meeting." If i understand this correctly, if there are say 4000 LIR members (a wild guess, no idea); and say 50 attend the GM (wild guess - no idea how many generally attend); then you can only accept 80 proxy votes for a total of 130 voting members. To me this does not seem like true representation. How does the Executive Board intend to recify this? or not? -Hank > >Cheers > >Daniele
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] RIPE tasks
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] RIPE tasks
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]