[ncc-services-wg] RIPE tasks
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] RIPE tasks
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] RIPE tasks
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Peter Galbavy
peter.galbavy at knowtion.net
Wed Aug 20 16:43:42 CEST 2003
Kurt Erik Lindqvist wrote: > What organizations have had the same low turn-out for AGMs and > interest in the agendas of the AGMs? Even if you could not attend the > AGM, did you bring up the issues on the mailinglists? Remember that > RIPE NCC is not there by it self. It is there for the reasons, and in > the way we have choose to have it. It has changed the ways we have > voted (or abstained from voted) it to change. We might not like the > outcome, but the better that we are now discussing this and that we > had the KPMG survey to act as a starting point to move on. And why is personal attendence at an AGM required to propose and vote on ongoing use of members funds ? I am amazed that no one has proposed any sort of online system. Or would that remove too much power from the professional bureaucrats that live off RIPE ? Peter
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] RIPE tasks
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] RIPE tasks
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]