[ncc-services-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: ICANN vs RIPE NCC, was Re: Summary of the PI ......
Kurt Erik Lindqvist kurtis at kurtis.pp.se
Tue Aug 19 21:23:10 CEST 2003
> I have NO communication path to approach this notional 5% as I do not > have > access to a membership list, and I dislike spamming folks anyway. Not > all > members are on an open mailing list (AFAIK) - or rather not all those > who > are in a position to vote on behalf oif their company. The ncc-services WG was created in order to create a forum for these discussions. You have from what I remember in the past used the LIR WG mailinglist for arguing your view. What else should we do? I will be the first yo say I certainly do not think that RIPE NCC have been up to their primary task, and I must say I am still in doubts. However, I will also acknowledge that the membership have not really been paying much attention and doing their job either. In principle we are where we are because of our own fault. _WE_, the users and members of the RIPE NCC should be giving feedback to Axel and the rest of the NCC management as well as the board on where we think NCC needs to go and what should change. They can not second guess us. - kurtis -