[ncc-services-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: ICANN vs RIPE NCC, was Re: Summary of the PI ......
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: ICANN vs RIPE NCC, was Re: Summary of the PI ......
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Proposal: Reduction of RIPE-NCC Actvities
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Kurt Erik Lindqvist
kurtis at kurtis.pp.se
Tue Aug 19 21:08:08 CEST 2003
Daniele, > I stand 100% with Daniel here. I can't speak for the others RIRs but I > strongly believe the RIPE-NCC has made significant efforts in the > recent past to listen to its membership, streamline procedures, and > positively react to constructive criticism. I think it a bit to early to start claiming progress. Quality have improved, but I think want a bit more before I start jumping up and down of joy. > There is more work to do, no doubt about it, but I can't see how > flaming on mailing lists helps. Agreed. > > Whomever has concrete ideas: I propose we move this discussion to the > ncc-services-wg list/group, that was created exactly for this purpose. Agreed! - kurtis -
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: ICANN vs RIPE NCC, was Re: Summary of the PI ......
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Proposal: Reduction of RIPE-NCC Actvities
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]