[ncc-services-wg] RIPE tasks
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] RIPE tasks
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] RIPE tasks
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hank Nussbacher
hank at att.net.il
Wed Aug 13 16:14:23 CEST 2003
At 01:21 PM 13-08-03 +0100, Neil J. McRae wrote: >In my view the the RIPE NCC should look at ways of splitting the >registration services away from "all the other stuff" and enable >the members to sign up to just the registration services without >funding all the other things that they may see little or no benefit >from. Those that see benefit from activties like the route monitoring >etc, can support them and fund them more directly. i have no problem with ripe ncc's lobbying efforts, since i consider it a valid, sane, and non-biased opinion vs. the lawyers and opportunists that have crowded themselves into icann. that being said, i may be a minority voice among ripe ncc membership on this issue. what i am asking for is that ripe ncc break down all their functions - and "ask/poll" its paying membership which to continue and which not to pursue. example: if the majority are in favor of funding ripe ncc training, i will have no problem with it. i will even become an advocate for it. -hank >Just to be clear, I don't think anyone, in most cases, has an >objection to what the RIPE has been doing or how its being done, >its more an objection of the "forced" participation through the >funding of the NCC which is completely unfair. > >The RIPE NCC management and board could easily deliver this, and >if they looked at the situation with an open mind they should know >that the current situation is unsustainable and they should be actively >leading to resolve this rather than risk the dangers of burying their >heads in the sand. > >Regards,
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] RIPE tasks
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] RIPE tasks
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]