This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/
[members-discuss] How can I vote against Charging Scheme A, B and C
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] How can I vote against Charging Scheme A, B and C
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] How can I vote against Charging Scheme A, B and C
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
ROSKOMNADZOR LIMITED
admin at roskomnadzor.io
Thu May 16 08:07:29 CEST 2024
Currently RIPE protecting BIG IPv4 holders, so your voices will not be really heared. And as described early - community havent ability to vote against, only RIPE EB can. We are ask Ondrej Filip about review option for adding variant "Versus all" in Charging Scheme voting, but currently no any decision. Anyway, if RIPE EB doesnt add any additional variants for voting - then community have 2 variants: 1) Make a lot of votes and start process of "firing" current RIPE EB OR 2) Collect some funds (around 100 EUR per donator) and hire lawyers who will be "helping" RIPE EB start to listening members. On 16.05.2024 5:56, Mikael Jirari via members-discuss wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I see so many discussions to end with what ? > An increasing charging scheme with A, B, C more or less the same. > > I don't understand that so much time is taken by the RIPE executive > board and people on the mailling list to end with more or less the same > scheme. > > I agree with some voices here. > Some members have large amount of IPv4 IP adresses and are big > buisnesses and have been around for a long time. > They retain these IPv4 and/or don't pay their fair part: Their cost per > IP are very low, they have the money to pay these IPv4 or release them > if they want. > On top of that, RIPE increase the charging by 20% > > This charging is a joke ! > It's like you are in a bar and there are 3 options on the menu: normal > coke, sugar free coke, cherry coke. What's the point ? > > => How can I vote against these A, B, C proposals ? > > a) LIR fee should be lower and packaged with 1 x /24 IPv4 + 1 x /32 IPv6 > in terms of price. > b) Big IPv4 owners should pay that 20% increase of RIPE budget and > handle the cost of a) > > Regards > > > > ********************************* > This message and any attachments (the "message") are confidential and > intended solely for the addressees. > Any unauthorised use or dissemination is prohibited. > Messages are susceptible to alteration. > Expertinet shall not be liable for the message if altered, changed or > falsified. > If you are not the intended addressee of this message, please cancel it > immediately and inform the sender. > ******************************** > > _______________________________________________ > members-discuss mailing list > members-discuss at ripe.net > https://mailman.ripe.net/ > Unsubscribe: > https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/admin%40roskomnadzor.io > > > > >
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] How can I vote against Charging Scheme A, B and C
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] How can I vote against Charging Scheme A, B and C
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]