This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/
[members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mentor Leniqi
mentor.leniqi at albahost.net
Wed May 15 18:52:18 CEST 2024
"Members voted" members like you, not the opposite. Oh and btw: *I want the same thing, but of course *we* should pay less, and *you* shouldpay more. And I can find lots of arguments why this is more fair (like,because we build this whole thing that you can now take for granted, orsomething else).* "you" builded whole thing and of course most likely and its crystal clear that you benefited from this. If you really would care too much about this build that "you" did for "us" to grant that much from your "build" be fair and accept the reality and implement a policy like other RIRs based on resource holder! Why are you so strongly against this if "you" builded for us?! On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 6:36 PM Gert Doering <gert at space.net> wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 06:31:41PM +0200, Mentor Leniqi wrote: > > Heh, i would'n post that much if the policy was fair just like other RIRs > > do charge based on resource. Let's be honest, if you agreed that posting > > too much should be charged more, i totally agree and a lot of other > members > > too, holding more resources should pay more. Very simple isn't it? > > That's back to "I want everyone else to pay more, and I want to pay less". > > I want the same thing, but of course *we* should pay less, and *you* should > pay more. And I can find lots of arguments why this is more fair (like, > because we build this whole thing that you can now take for granted, or > something else). > > So, a reasonable compromise seems to be "all members pay the same", and > this is what members vote for, multiple times. > > Gert Doering > -- NetMaster > -- > have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? > > SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Ingo > Lalla, > Karin Schuler, Sebastian Cler > Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann > D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) > Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20240515/4e0d2a26/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]