[members-discuss] Charging scheme 2025 proposal (logarithmic)
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Charging scheme 2025 proposal (logarithmic)
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Charging scheme 2025 proposal (logarithmic)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sebastien Brossier
sebastien at brossier.org
Tue Apr 16 23:21:56 CEST 2024
With a charging scheme based on resources, a /32 is bound to be cheaper than a /29. Even so, a small LIR with a /29 would still pay less than with the current charging scheme. It is possible to put less charges on IPv6 by increasing Offset_IPv6, but it would need to be compensated by an increase in Base_Fee and it would be less proportional. On 16/04/2024 16:37, Mihail Fedorov wrote: > I once again advise to put less charges on IPv6. Genrally it’s a good > and correct approach. But in current reality this will result need to > restructure v6 subnets for everyone, who opted into /29 but using /32 > (which is what many small LIRs do) and create additional work for > everyone. In some distant future there will be no difference but for now > every occasion to motivate networks to have IPv6 should be valued.
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Charging scheme 2025 proposal (logarithmic)
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Charging scheme 2025 proposal (logarithmic)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]