[members-discuss] Voting for RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2024

>Absolutely agree!
>This voting looks like manipulating.

So you absolutely agree with the explanation that STV is fair, but also
that it's manipulative?

Q Director

+44 33 33 408690
<https://as207960.net>
------------------------------

Any statements contained in this email are personal to the author and are
not necessarily the statements of the company unless specifically stated.
AS207960 Cyfyngedig, having a registered office at 13 Pen-y-lan Terrace,
Caerdydd, Cymru, CF23 9EU, trading as Glauca Digital, is a company
registered in Wales under № 12417574
<https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/12417574>,
LEI 875500FXNCJPAPF3PD10. ICO register №: ZA782876
<https://ico.org.uk/ESDWebPages/Entry/ZA782876>. UK VAT №: GB378323867. EU
VAT №: EU372013983. Turkish VAT №: 0861333524. South Korean VAT №:
522-80-03080. Glauca Digital and the Glauca logo are registered trademarks
in the UK, under № UK00003718474 and № UK00003718468, respectively.


On Wed, 24 May 2023 at 14:17, <sdy at a-n-t.ru> wrote:

> Absolutely agree!
> This voting looks like manipulating.
> NCC now works like not clear hand politicians.....
> Serbulov Dmitry
>
> > Hi,
> >
> >> The voting procedure is “instant run-off” which clearly benefits what
> >> RIPE wants – Charging scheme A.
> >
> > Cards on the table: my LIR will see a substantial increase in our RIPE
> NCC
> > service fees from the category-based model, but I do not believe the
> above
> > is necessarily correct.
> >
> > To win, one of the charging schemes must get more than 50% of the vote.
> >
> > If we assume that more than 50% of the members want flat fee, but are
> > evenly split between models B, C and D, then after the first round of
> > voting, A will have 48% (say) of the votes, and the remaining 52% split
> > between B, C and D.
> >
> > At that point, as nobody has > 50%, the lowest of B, C or D will be
> > reallocated to their second preference votes.  Presumably most of those
> > will also put another category-based option as their second preference.
> >
> > If you want flat fee, it’s probably important to rank B, C and D
> according
> > to your preference, but include all of them.
> >
> > If you want category-based, then obviously vote for that. :)
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Rob
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > members-discuss mailing list
> > members-discuss at ripe.net
> > https://e.as207960.net/w4bdyj/dg6wG9UL
> > Unsubscribe:
> > https://e.as207960.net/w4bdyj/cSVNj9YR
> >
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> members-discuss mailing list
> members-discuss at ripe.net
> https://e.as207960.net/w4bdyj/W98RrL4A
> Unsubscribe:
> https://e.as207960.net/w4bdyj/PifJdvMi
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20230524/d209af2e/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4640 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20230524/d209af2e/attachment-0001.p7s>