[members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Consultation on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Consultation on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Consultation on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
sdy at a-n-t.ru
sdy at a-n-t.ru
Sat Mar 18 06:27:09 CET 2023
Sorry, the last xls file didn't work completely. Good in attachment. > Dear all, > > First off, I apologise for the length of this email, but I hope to cover > a number of points brought up in the consultation so far. > > I want to thank you again for your input so far on the models. We are > busy looking at all the feedback. We have also seen over 100 members > sign up for the Open House next week to discuss this further, so I > appreciate your interest in helping us to reach a good outcome. > > Looking at the feedback we've seen so far, there are a number of > questions and points raised where I can help to add clarity and also > answer some specific questions. > > 1. Some of you asked for a breakdown of the IPv4 address space held by > LIRs to help with your consideration of a category-based model. So here > is a chart with that information: > https://www.ripe.net/participate/mail/member-and-community-consultations/distribution-of-total-allocated-ipv4-per-lir.png > > I’d like to note that in the models we are developing, we are looking to > move to a model that charges per member rather than per LIR account. So > I also have an indicative spread of how many members would be in each > category in the model we shared: > https://www.ripe.net/participate/mail/member-and-community-consultations/member-spread-across-categories.png > > 2. To clarify what determines the category someone is placed within in > the model I shared, it is the highest score for just one of the > following types of resource: > - IPv4 allocations > - IPv6 allocations > - ASN assignments > - Independent resources (includes all resource assignments not in the > previous three categories, including all sponsored items) > Note: Independent resources are charged by number of assignments rather > than by the amount of IPs within the assignment. > > So if your highest score is for IPv4 allocations, then the amount for > IPv6 allocations, ASNs or independent resources does not contribute to > the category you are placed in. The highest score of the four defines > the category. The elements that we charge for in the categories or > separately can of course change or be refined based on your feedback. > > 3. Another person asked for comparison with other RIR charging schemes, > and I provide links to the information on their websites: > APNIC: > https://www.apnic.net/get-ip/apnic-membership/how-much-does-it-cost/ > ARIN: https://www.arin.net/resources/fees/fee_schedule/ > AFRINIC: https://afrinic.net/membership/cost#resource > LACNIC: > https://www.lacnic.net/2399/2/lacnic/membership-fees-and-categories > > 4. There was a question on how we charge for those who are still on the > waiting list and have not yet received any IPv4 address space. We are > still looking at how this might work and it is something I can bring up > during the Open House. Potentially, there could be a base membership fee > and another fee once IPv4 resources are received. > > 5. There was a request for comment on the idea that the RIPE NCC had > permitted multiple LIRs in order to allow some members to receive more > address space. In fact, the members themselves voted at the General > Meeting to allow this in 2016. There had been a resolution by the > Executive Board to stop the creation of multiple LIR accounts in 2015; > there was a lengthy discussion about this and the Board therefore asked > the members to discuss the issue and make a decision on the matter in > 2016. > > Board Resolution: > https://www.ripe.net/publications/news/announcements/board-resolution-to-suspend-creation-of-multiple-lir-accounts > > Membership Vote: > https://www.ripe.net/participate/meetings/gm/meetings/may-2016 > > Finally, there was a comment that we need to achieve a balance between > fairness and complexity. This comment really resonates with me, given > that there are possibly as many ways to charge as there are IPv6 > addresses. At the Open House next week, I plan to present updated models > that take as much of your feedback as possible into account, and of > course I'll share that information afterwards with the full membership. > > Charging Scheme 2024 Open House: > https://www.ripe.net/participate/meetings/open-house/ripe-ncc-open-house-charging-scheme-2024-consultation > > Kind regards, > > Simon Jan Haytink > Finance Director > RIPE NCC > > _______________________________________________ > members-discuss mailing list > members-discuss at ripe.net > https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss > Unsubscribe: > https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/sdy%40a-n-t.ru > ----------------------------- С уважением Сербулов Дмитрий ООО "Альфа Нет Телеком" +7(498)785-8-000 раб. +7(495)940-92-11 доп. +7(925)518-10-69 сот. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: CalcRIPE_2024.xls Type: application/vnd.ms-excel Size: 18944 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20230318/759a28ac/attachment-0001.xls>
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Consultation on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Consultation on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]