[members-discuss] Board minutes regarding investigation

All,

As a member of RIPE I do believe our community can do better on many fronts. However, hashing out the details and bashing volunteers on Telegram and email is not the way to improve things. 

I am grateful the Board sought external non-biased help. As expertise in this area does not fall with the scope of expectations I have for the Board. 

I hope everyone takes a moment to support these volunteers as they make changes to improve the community based on what they have learned here. And I hope every member considers the implications and importance of how you vote for our leaders, for better or worse they are generally there for 3 years and we need to trust them to make the right choices. This should never be a popularity contest. 


Tina Morris 

> On Jan 19, 2023, at 05:43, Ondřej Filip <exec-board-announce at ripe.net> wrote:
> 
> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know the content is safe.
> 
> 
> 
> Dear Sander, all,
> 
> I understand there are many questions about the investigation and I will
> do my best to answer them, bearing in mind that there are people's
> privacy to take into account and that all details of the investigation
> report cannot be revealed.
> 
> First, this has been an incredibly difficult experience for the RIPE NCC
> and in particular for the staff member concerned who made an allegation
> of bullying and intimidating treatment by an Executive Board member. We
> therefore took the matter very seriously and engaged the law firm
> BenninkAmar Advocaten to carry out a neutral investigation reporting to
> the rest of the board as announced on 17 May 2022:
> https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/ncc-announce/2022-May/001574.html
> 
> The law firm we engaged is one that we have used in the past for
> conducting investigations and advising us on sanctions-related matters.
> The Board member under investigation was not involved in the decision to
> start the investigation,  in choosing the law firm we engaged or the
> conclusion.
> 
> We have no doubt as to their independence throughout the investigation,
> especially as this was something we insisted upon when engaging them.
> All stakeholders interviewed were informed by the investigator of their
> right to engage their own counsel. Upon request, the legal costs for the
> Board member who was under investigation were covered by the RIPE NCC.
> The RIPE NCC made a claim for recovery of these costs from the Directors
> Liability Insurance.
> 
> Our responsibilities extend to good governance of the RIPE NCC,
> including the well-being of the staff. These were our guiding principles
> in setting the scope for the investigating team. The independent
> investigator team was tasked to determine if any non-compliance with
> RIPE NCC internal policies took place or if any applicable laws were
> violated. The RIPE NCC internal policies include the RIPE NCC Code of
> Conduct and the RIPE NCC Whistleblower policy, which gives the reporter
> protection against unfair treatment. The RIPE NCC Code of Conduct is
> more extensive than the RIPE community Code of Conduct but the parts
> regarding bullying and harassment are essentially the same. The RIPE NCC
> Code of Conduct and Whistleblower Policy are both available at:
> https://www.ripe.net/about-us/staff/staff-policies
> 
> We do regret how long it took to reach a conclusion. We would have
> preferred a quicker outcome but once we started this process we were
> committed to seeing it through. And now the investigation is complete.
> Of course, this does not mean that the matter is closed and in many ways
> it is only the beginning - there is work to be done.
> 
> I met with staff, together with the previous Executive Board Chair, to
> talk at length about the investigation and what we could have done
> better. We wanted to do this before we announced the outcome of the
> investigation publicly. We received lots of feedback that both the Board
> and Hans Petter will use to see how we can make improvements should we
> have similar cases in the future. It is clear that we can make changes
> that will benefit the RIPE NCC staff for the years to come.
> 
> This has been a huge learning experience for us all. We have learned
> that our processes did not fully cover this situation when it arose. We
> need to do a lot of work as the Executive Board to see that appropriate
> measures are taken to prevent such a situation from recurring and to
> have those measures firmly in place should it happen again.
> 
> We also learned a lot from meeting the RIPE NCC staff and from hearing
> their concerns. Many of the concerns they shared with us are ones we
> share, so we are committed to addressing them. There are no real
> positives to be taken from this situation, but the overwhelming support
> we saw from staff for their colleague, who is clearly respected and
> admired by RIPE NCC colleagues and in the community, was something that
> gives us great encouragement.
> 
> The changes we propose to make will of course be communicated to members
> and in some cases will even need their support at General Meetings. We
> strive to do better, and to do so we will ask for your help and your
> support. If we can make real changes to ensure the safety and well-being
> of the people who give so much to ensure the Internet works for us all,
> then some good might come from this experience.
> 
> Best regards,
> Ondřej Filip
> RIPE NCC Executive Board Chair
> 
> 
>> On 17/01/2023 13:48, Sander Steffann wrote:
>> Hi board,
>> 
>> I am looking at the minutes of board meeting 163, and I have a few questions.
>> 
>> The minutes state that "The investigation was tasked to identify whether there have been violations of the RIPE NCC Code of Conduct”. At the last AGM I asked if there was a Code of Conduct for board members, and as far as I remember there wasn’t any. So which Code of Conduct do you refer to here? If it is different from the RIPE Code of Conduct please provide either a link or the full text.
>> 
>> Looking at the RIPE Code of Conduct, which applies to all of us in this community, it identifies some examples of positive behaviour, like accepting differing viewpoints and experiences, being considerate and showing empathy towards others, especially when disagreeing or raising issues, and giving/receiving feedback or suggestions in a positive way. It follows with "Behaviours that undermine our values are unacceptable and will not be tolerated."
>> 
>> I have personally definitely seen behaviour contradicting the points mentioned above from the board member in question (and I have heard many others express the same) but apparently they ARE now being tolerated. Please explain this discrepancy between the Code of Conduct and the outcome of this investigation.
>> 
>> The goals of the Code of conduct are to help everyone feel safe and included and to make everyone aware of expected behaviour. As far as I can see we have failed on both accounts here…
>> 
>> Sincerely,
>> Sander Steffann
>> 
>> PS: just to make sure, who actually performed the investigation? I assume it was a completely independent party with no previous, current or future ties to the RIPE NCC, financial or otherwise. Please confirm.
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> members-discuss mailing list
>> members-discuss at ripe.net
>> https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss
>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/fergalc%40ripe.net
> 
> _______________________________________________
> members-discuss mailing list
> members-discuss at ripe.net
> https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/tinam%40amazon.com