[members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Consultation on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Consultation on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Consultation on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ben Cartwright-Cox
ripencc at benjojo.co.uk
Thu Apr 13 16:18:15 CEST 2023
Yup, I was also surprised that the seemingly default allocation for v6 was considered a higher category! Is it really worth it for the NCC to chase people for the difference between a /32 and a /29? I was under the impression that the /29 was reserved anyway each time a LIR got a v6 block. On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 3:13 PM David Brůha <d.bruha at virtis.cz> wrote: > > Hello, > > > I agree. We are actually renting a server for offsite backups in Canada and the provider charges 1 Euro per month for 1 additional IP address. No way anyone would return unused IPv4 addresses. > > > But after seeing the new updated calculator we would definitely return part of our IPv6 allocation if the charging scheme category A should be chosen. The "free" enlargement from /32 to /29 suddenly costs 350 Euro per year. > > > -- > > Kind regards > > > > David > > > > e-mail: d.bruha at virtis.cz > > Dne čtvrtek 30. března 2023 15:22:15 CEST, Kaj Niemi napsal(a): > > > It won’t. I believe most will either a) rent out, or b) sell their unused IP > > > addresses if it becomes a choice between having to pay for the privilege of > > > keeping vs converting them to either continuous (renting out) or onetime > > > (sale) revenue. > > > > > > LIRs who have an acute IPv4 address deficit will, realistically, need to > > > procure more addresses on the free market. That is, if they intend to grow > > > their business and not let it stagnate. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Kaj > > > > > > Sent from my iPhone > > > ________________________________ > > > From: members-discuss <members-discuss-bounces at ripe.net> on behalf of José > > > Manuel Giner via members-discuss <members-discuss at ripe.net> Sent: > > > Wednesday, March 29, 2023 10:14:30 PM > > > To: members-discuss at ripe.net <members-discuss at ripe.net> > > > Subject: Re: [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Consultation on RIPE NCC > > > Charging Scheme > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > I think it is very necessary to address the problem of LIRs that need > > > IPs in relation to LIRs that have +80% of their IPs unused. > > > > > > How to fix? maybe a pay per individual IP model? > > > > > > For example: 0.25 €/year per IP. > > > > > > I think this will make those who have unused IPs give them back and > > > reduce speculation, which I think are the two big problems. > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > -- > > > José Manuel Giner > > > https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fginernet.c > > > om%2F&data=05%7C01%7C%7Cfffe6b8d017542a0100f08db311a3cc1%7Cd0b71c570f9b4acc9 > > > 23b81d0b26b55b3%7C0%7C0%7C638157760994467552%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjo > > > iMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C& > > > sdata=XwY9HPEkXKXBM%2BpxqAxU5OSX6NNV%2FvP46yUJSfQIC0M%3D&reserved=0 > > > On 17/03/2023 10:24, Simon-Jan Haytink wrote: > > > > Dear all, > > > > > > > > First off, I apologise for the length of this email, but I hope to cover > > > > a number of points brought up in the consultation so far. > > > > > > > > I want to thank you again for your input so far on the models. We are > > > > busy looking at all the feedback. We have also seen over 100 members > > > > sign up for the Open House next week to discuss this further, so I > > > > appreciate your interest in helping us to reach a good outcome. > > > > > > > > Looking at the feedback we've seen so far, there are a number of > > > > questions and points raised where I can help to add clarity and also > > > > answer some specific questions. > > > > > > > > 1. Some of you asked for a breakdown of the IPv4 address space held by > > > > LIRs to help with your consideration of a category-based model. So here > > > > is a chart with that information: > > > > https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ripe > > > > .net%2Fparticipate%2Fmail%2Fmember-and-community-consultations%2Fdistribut > > > > ion-of-total-allocated-ipv4-per-lir.png&data=05%7C01%7C%7Cfffe6b8d017542a0 > > > > 100f08db311a3cc1%7Cd0b71c570f9b4acc923b81d0b26b55b3%7C0%7C0%7C638157760994 > > > > 623871%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI > > > > 6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=5gCFELEOWGX6ULpsEGUdpHHcczGA > > > > ij3nMotVAWCFKXg%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > > > > I’d like to note that in the models we are developing, we are looking to > > > > move to a model that charges per member rather than per LIR account. So > > > > I also have an indicative spread of how many members would be in each > > > > category in the model we shared: > > > > https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ripe > > > > .net%2Fparticipate%2Fmail%2Fmember-and-community-consultations%2Fmember-sp > > > > read-across-categories.png&data=05%7C01%7C%7Cfffe6b8d017542a0100f08db311a3 > > > > cc1%7Cd0b71c570f9b4acc923b81d0b26b55b3%7C0%7C0%7C638157760994623871%7CUnkn > > > > own%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJX > > > > VCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=McgLLf5YS41Pc47Zbhz95myWZLA8TKDx0Jku5FjY2 > > > > Ao%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > > > > 2. To clarify what determines the category someone is placed within in > > > > the model I shared, it is the highest score for just one of the > > > > following types of resource: > > > > - IPv4 allocations > > > > - IPv6 allocations > > > > - ASN assignments > > > > - Independent resources (includes all resource assignments not in the > > > > previous three categories, including all sponsored items) > > > > Note: Independent resources are charged by number of assignments rather > > > > than by the amount of IPs within the assignment. > > > > > > > > So if your highest score is for IPv4 allocations, then the amount for > > > > IPv6 allocations, ASNs or independent resources does not contribute to > > > > the category you are placed in. The highest score of the four defines > > > > the category. The elements that we charge for in the categories or > > > > separately can of course change or be refined based on your feedback. > > > > > > > > 3. Another person asked for comparison with other RIR charging schemes, > > > > and I provide links to the information on their websites: > > > > APNIC: > > > > https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.apn > > > > ic.net%2Fget-ip%2Fapnic-membership%2Fhow-much-does-it-cost%2F&data=05%7C01 > > > > %7C%7Cfffe6b8d017542a0100f08db311a3cc1%7Cd0b71c570f9b4acc923b81d0b26b55b3% > > > > 7C0%7C0%7C638157760994623871%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiL > > > > CJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=PJ%2BC > > > > PI4x8eDbknzv%2BjShaOX9n1%2Bs0sCt6ZhmtVffjMU%3D&reserved=0 ARIN: > > > > https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ari > > > > n.net%2Fresources%2Ffees%2Ffee_schedule%2F&data=05%7C01%7C%7Cfffe6b8d01754 > > > > 2a0100f08db311a3cc1%7Cd0b71c570f9b4acc923b81d0b26b55b3%7C0%7C0%7C638157760 > > > > 994623871%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJB > > > > TiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=TAFgtin8UkyHacIE9%2F%2B06 > > > > 0Yc%2BYrCoBdbeJlplnza7oU%3D&reserved=0 AFRINIC: > > > > https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fafrinic > > > > .net%2Fmembership%2Fcost%23resource&data=05%7C01%7C%7Cfffe6b8d017542a0100f > > > > 08db311a3cc1%7Cd0b71c570f9b4acc923b81d0b26b55b3%7C0%7C0%7C6381577609946238 > > > > 71%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1 > > > > haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=cb4Aaz%2FYHRUTS49YAvLPQzjeXNE5Pm > > > > UZ1B1MVD%2BFMYM%3D&reserved=0 LACNIC: > > > > https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.lac > > > > nic.net%2F2399%2F2%2Flacnic%2Fmembership-fees-and-categories&data=05%7C01% > > > > 7C%7Cfffe6b8d017542a0100f08db311a3cc1%7Cd0b71c570f9b4acc923b81d0b26b55b3%7 > > > > C0%7C0%7C638157760994623871%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLC > > > > JQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=CIQB4Nf > > > > tyPEkV4x7BuT7dPlDIJNxyLMtFtuqGAiI0j4%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > > > > 4. There was a question on how we charge for those who are still on the > > > > waiting list and have not yet received any IPv4 address space. We are > > > > still looking at how this might work and it is something I can bring up > > > > during the Open House. Potentially, there could be a base membership fee > > > > and another fee once IPv4 resources are received. > > > > > > > > 5. There was a request for comment on the idea that the RIPE NCC had > > > > permitted multiple LIRs in order to allow some members to receive more > > > > address space. In fact, the members themselves voted at the General > > > > Meeting to allow this in 2016. There had been a resolution by the > > > > Executive Board to stop the creation of multiple LIR accounts in 2015; > > > > there was a lengthy discussion about this and the Board therefore asked > > > > the members to discuss the issue and make a decision on the matter in > > > > 2016. > > > > > > > > Board Resolution: > > > > https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ripe > > > > .net%2Fpublications%2Fnews%2Fannouncements%2Fboard-resolution-to-suspend-c > > > > reation-of-multiple-lir-accounts&data=05%7C01%7C%7Cfffe6b8d017542a0100f08d > > > > b311a3cc1%7Cd0b71c570f9b4acc923b81d0b26b55b3%7C0%7C0%7C638157760994623871% > > > > 7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haW > > > > wiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=2jAWk7ZRZjTNSlfqpVwX648Bu1kwsfXvXvC > > > > LRGD1xWE%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > > > > Membership Vote: > > > > https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ripe > > > > .net%2Fparticipate%2Fmeetings%2Fgm%2Fmeetings%2Fmay-2016&data=05%7C01%7C%7 > > > > Cfffe6b8d017542a0100f08db311a3cc1%7Cd0b71c570f9b4acc923b81d0b26b55b3%7C0%7 > > > > C0%7C638157760994623871%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIj > > > > oiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=VefCoEB5Mso > > > > WARWN1HNe7c441x1uUHDXXcNy%2BXR6naU%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > > > > Finally, there was a comment that we need to achieve a balance between > > > > fairness and complexity. This comment really resonates with me, given > > > > that there are possibly as many ways to charge as there are IPv6 > > > > addresses. At the Open House next week, I plan to present updated models > > > > that take as much of your feedback as possible into account, and of > > > > course I'll share that information afterwards with the full membership. > > > > > > > > Charging Scheme 2024 Open House: > > > > https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ripe > > > > .net%2Fparticipate%2Fmeetings%2Fopen-house%2Fripe-ncc-open-house-charging- > > > > scheme-2024-consultation&data=05%7C01%7C%7Cfffe6b8d017542a0100f08db311a3cc > > > > 1%7Cd0b71c570f9b4acc923b81d0b26b55b3%7C0%7C0%7C638157760994623871%7CUnknow > > > > n%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVC > > > > I6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=OGs8lfe9V5NrsDKah9IijvLUu9pT57qicuzQ0A7Vx1s > > > > %3D&reserved=0 > > > > > > > > Kind regards, > > > > > > > > Simon Jan Haytink > > > > Finance Director > > > > RIPE NCC > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > members-discuss mailing list > > > > members-discuss at ripe.net > > > > https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ri > > > > pe.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmembers-discuss&data=05%7C01%7C%7Cfffe6b8d01 > > > > 7542a0100f08db311a3cc1%7Cd0b71c570f9b4acc923b81d0b26b55b3%7C0%7C0%7C638157 > > > > 760994623871%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiL > > > > CJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=Ezweqpi8sbAxU7BuqAipMO > > > > oor5dg2ZJkwHZrc%2FmLvzg%3D&reserved=0 Unsubscribe: > > > > https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ri > > > > pe.net%2Fmailman%2Foptions%2Fmembers-discuss%2Fjm%2540ginernet.com&data=05 > > > > %7C01%7C%7Cfffe6b8d017542a0100f08db311a3cc1%7Cd0b71c570f9b4acc923b81d0b26b > > > > 55b3%7C0%7C0%7C638157760994623871%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAw > > > > MDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=Y > > > > sMJRvSdn1aPgoLdHDPN%2F%2Bit5ZbjITIKrLVy53p6f4Q%3D&reserved=0 > > > _______________________________________________ > > > members-discuss mailing list > > > members-discuss at ripe.net > > > https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe > > > .net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmembers-discuss&data=05%7C01%7C%7Cfffe6b8d017542 > > > a0100f08db311a3cc1%7Cd0b71c570f9b4acc923b81d0b26b55b3%7C0%7C0%7C638157760994 > > > 623871%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6I > > > k1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=Ezweqpi8sbAxU7BuqAipMOoor5dg2ZJk > > > wHZrc%2FmLvzg%3D&reserved=0 Unsubscribe: > > > https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.rip > > > e.net%2Fmailman%2Foptions%2Fmembers-discuss%2Fkajtzu%2540basen.net&data=05%7 > > > C01%7C%7Cfffe6b8d017542a0100f08db311a3cc1%7Cd0b71c570f9b4acc923b81d0b26b55b3 > > > %7C0%7C0%7C638157760994623871%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLC > > > JQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=07XDQnkxG > > > dtpxO5XGM5uzNnLWDJcuh6Kip4IpFioKwU%3D&reserved=0 > > > > _______________________________________________ > members-discuss mailing list > members-discuss at ripe.net > https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss > Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/ripencc%40benjojo.co.uk
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Consultation on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Consultation on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]