[members-discuss] Draft Activity Plan 2021 - RPKI development

Hi all,
Is it worth seeing if there is another organisation who could take RIPE's
work and knowledge, and further the cause if RIPE are withdrawing
development time? I suspect a lot more organisations would be interested in
a product if it had the RIPE brand on it, even if RIPE were not completely
involved in it's development.

Just my 2 pence.

Harry

On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 5:09 PM Lukas Tribus <lukas at ltri.eu> wrote:

> Gert wrote:
> > When we looked at possible software options for our RPKI validator, we
> > compared performance, memory, robustness, agility of development, and
> > this all concluded in "this was nice as a demonstration vehicle, but I do
> > not want to run it near a any production system, ever".
>
> The real issue is: a lot of network operators do NOT have the time for
> this kind of assessment. They make a judgement call based on the good
> overall reputation of RIPE (and as Erik mentioned: training) and just
> go with it.
>
> I agree and support sunsetting the development of the RIPE RPKI validator.
>
> -- lukas
>
> _______________________________________________
> members-discuss mailing list
> members-discuss at ripe.net
> https://mailman.ripe.net/
> Unsubscribe:
> https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/me%40harrycross.me
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20200928/2f396d39/attachment.html>