This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[members-discuss] Webauthn
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Webauthn
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Webauthn
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Antonios Chariton (daknob)
daknob at daknob.net
Fri Oct 2 12:49:55 CEST 2020
Thanks for bringing this up Bogdan. I fully agree, and I think it’s something that can ensure better account security for the RIPE members. I think as a minimum, multiple keys must be supported, and also, ideally, there should be an option to only use WebAuthn, and not any other system, such as fallback to TOTP. Antonis > On 2 Oct 2020, at 02:18, Bogdan I. <admin at redcluster.net> wrote: > > Hello > > What would be your opinion of implementing Webauthn / U2F by security keys for the RIPE NCC website's two factor authentication, in addition to the current TOTP system? > > The current TOTP based system works fine, but i find using a physical security key to be more convenient and more secure. > > -- > Bogdan Ionescu > Redcluster LTD > > > _______________________________________________ > members-discuss mailing list > members-discuss at ripe.net > https://mailman.ripe.net/ > Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/daknob%40daknob.net
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Webauthn
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Webauthn
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]