This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[members-discuss] Request to put Members-discuss in moderation
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Request to put Members-discuss in moderation
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Request to put Members-discuss in moderation
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Markus Zeilinger
markus.zeilinger at fh-hagenberg.at
Tue Jul 21 13:15:36 CEST 2020
Hi all, List moderation? NO Ignore the single source of troubles? YES Putting this single source of troubles onto the board election task force is a step I can hardly understand. Completely agree with Andrei. I think someone from the board should come up with an explanation. Best regards Markus On 21.07.20 13:03, Viethen, Christoph wrote: > Hello Andrei, > > I think the point you are making is a valid one and I think others may have similar thoughts. This certainly includes myself. > > Still, I think that, with regard to the Task Force, we should wait and see. For the moment, I'm convinced that we will hear a report from them (or from their chair) sooner or later, letting us know how productive (or not) their work is and how/if it is progressing. > > Let's give them a little bit of time – they're still pretty new in their roles and I think we should maintain a little bit of positivity about things. > > > If I were in their position, I would certainly establish a Task Force Code of Conduct which requires their members to publicly talk about Task Force matters only in specific ways. For example, they might decide to publish opinions every now and then, and in this context publish an "agreed-upon opinion" plus additional diverging opinions, nicely summarized in a report which we members get. > > Apart from these reports, such a Code of Conduct should require their members to remain silent and not talk publicly about Task Force matters, or else be sanctioned (as in: excluded from the Task Force). I think this way, professional behaviour can be maintained. > > > Could the Exec Board (or whoever may be in charge of this) please comment on this matter? That is: do you feel a Task Force Code of Conduct should be implemented? That could be interesting for members. > > > Thanks & best regards > > Christoph > > > > _______________________________________________ > members-discuss mailing list > members-discuss at ripe.net > https://mailman.ripe.net/ > Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/markus.zeilinger%40fh-hagenberg.at > -- Dipl.-Ing. Markus Zeilinger Studiengänge Sichere Informationssysteme Fakultät für Informatik, Kommunikation und Medien FH Oberösterreich FH-Gebäude 1, Raum A 005 Softwarepark 11 4232 Hagenberg Tel.: +43 (0) 5 0804 22524 Mobil: +43 (0) 664 8048422524 Fax: +43 (0) 5 0804 22599 E-Mail: m.zeilinger at fh-hagenberg.at Web: www.fh-ooe.at Firmenbuchgericht/Court of registry: Landesgericht Wels Firmenbuchnummer/Company registration: FN 236729 g
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Request to put Members-discuss in moderation
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Request to put Members-discuss in moderation
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]