[members-discuss] Administrative procedures within RIPE NCC: Any way to soften it ?

that escalated quickly :D

as I have not had any issues with merging, sponsoring, splitting mother-daughter, I can’t agree that the NCC would do it on purpose. I’m sorry to hear that others are having issues with NCC.
Just wanted to put my 2 cents in defence of the them and thank them for their services.
NCC has always been understanding in my cases and pointing me to the docs/papers needed to complete the tickets.
as for the DB updating - automate it. I’ve seen ipams opensource (phpipam/ipPlan) that had “the option”.

p.s.
I’ll enable v6 on something today :D 

but I’m guilty of not using “democracy” -  haven’t interacted with voting.

> On 8 Jul 2020, at 21:11, Gert Doering <gert at space.net> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> On Wed, Jul 08, 2020 at 09:06:06PM +0300, Aleksey Bulgakov wrote:
>> LIR's don't have influence, because there are some people who decide are
>> there enough money for bloated budget, is it time to implement any
>> restrictions and which voice is good and which one  should not be accepted.
> 
> This statement is blatantly wrong, and you are aware of that.
> 
> If the NCC management / board are indeed not listening to you, you can 
> (as a member) put it as a voting item on the next AGM agenda.
> 
> Now, if most of your LIR colleagues disagree with you, that's the problem
> with voting.
> 
> Gert Doering
>        -- NetMaster
> -- 
> have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
> 
> SpaceNet AG                      Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer
> Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14        Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
> D-80807 Muenchen                 HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
> Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444         USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
> _______________________________________________
> members-discuss mailing list
> members-discuss at ripe.net
> https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss