[members-discuss] New (silent) reverse dns checks

why does it make sense? I don't see how one follows from the other.
Registrars doing such checks are generally frowned upon as they get in
the way of out-of-order provisioning.

On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 2:07 PM Kurt Erik Lindqvist <kurtis at linx.net> wrote:
>
> On 7 Jun 2019, at 12:54, Rudolf E. Steiner <r.steiner at nemox.net> wrote:
>
> >> Split them into different IP addresses and RIPE won’t mind.
> >
> > I know. But RIPE is not the internet-police.
> >
> > Don't block open resolvers! You can warn, if you want.
>
> Most registrars check the same for forward delegations so I think RIPE checking the same for reverse make sense.
>
> - Kurtis -
>
> _______________________________________________
> members-discuss mailing list
> members-discuss at ripe.net
> https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/job%40instituut.net