[members-discuss] New (silent) reverse dns checks
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] New (silent) reverse dns checks
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] New (silent) reverse dns checks
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Rudolf E. Steiner
r.steiner at nemox.net
Fri Jun 7 12:29:22 CEST 2019
Jonas Frey wrote: > we just found out that RIPE seems to have silently integrated new > checks for reverse delegation of zones. > Its no longer possible to add or even change a zone if the nameservers > used by them are open recursors. The update will fail. Indeed? Really? Wow. > Yes - open recursors are (sometimes) bad. But there are legitimate > reasons to run them (freedom of speech, filtered resources etc). Once > properly configured (i.e. querys rate limited) they wont pose a threat. We strongly agree. Don't blacklist open resolvers RIPE! -- nemox.net Rudolf E. Steiner r.steiner at nemox.net http://nemox.net/pdat/res/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: r_steiner.vcf Type: text/x-vcard Size: 265 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20190607/09643582/attachment.vcf> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 4184 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20190607/09643582/attachment.p7s>
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] New (silent) reverse dns checks
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] New (silent) reverse dns checks
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]