[members-discuss] New Charging Scheme
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] New Charging Scheme
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] New Charging Scheme
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Thomas Gallo - Nice Blue srl
thomas at niceblue.it
Thu Jan 17 20:33:34 CET 2019
this sound a very nice approach that could clearly put all on the same plane: you can spend as you need ipv4 or you can return them if you don't use it... Thomas Il 17/01/19 14:30, ivaylo ha scritto: > > Hello, Jonas > > Thank you for the numbers ! In my previous mail told, that these are > examples only and pointed exact to this so now it is clear if the > charging scheme is on net basis: > > 26000000 (targeting budget) / 3108576 = 8.37 EUROs for /24 per year ! > > Even if we put targeting budget x 2 it is very resonable fee for one > /24 net. > > Also permanent LIR to LIR resources transfers must be disabled. Then > what we will have: > (again example numbers) > > registration fee: 2000 EURO Anual membership fee: 350 EURO (receive > one /24 for free) > For every next /24 dedicated + 10 EURO > > All LIR to LIR permanent transfers - disabled (If you need resources > ask RIPE, if you dont need return to RIPE) > > Off course bigger operators that need large resources will pay more > than now, but it is absolutely normal, they have larger bussiness with > a lot more revenue, It is not fair to put on same basis small telecom > with 2k-3k clients and operator with 20m - 30m clients. > > > Ivaylo Josifov > Varteh LTD > Varna Bulgaria > > > On Thu, 17 Jan 2019, Jonas Frey wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> sorry but that type of billing is totally nonsense. You obvisously >> never calculated this with real data. Let me do it for you: >> >> According to >> ftp://ftp.ripe.net/ripe/stats/delegated-ripencc-extended-latest >> RIPE currently assigned 817101048 IP addresses for real-use (excluding >> reserved and free etc.). >> That equals to roughly 3191800 /24's. There are currently 20806 LIR's ( >> https://labs.ripe.net/statistics/number-of-lirs), if each one is >> getting a /22 free, that means we have to deduct 83224 /24's from above >> figure. That makes it 3108576 /24's which should be billed (according >> to you). >> 3108576*350 = 1.088.001.600,00 Euros. Yes, thats 1 billion euros. >> RIPE's budget for 2018 was (projected) to be 26 million euros: >> https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-693 >> >> As you can see this is utterly nonsense. As you might know, any surplus >> the RIPE NCC generates (at the end of the fiscal year) will be re- >> distributed to the members as RIPE is a association and not a company >> in regular terms. >> >> Or are you trying to actually get paid from RIPE for using little count >> of IPv4 addresses? >> >> Anything that is money related will *not* help to get IPv4 back or >> solve this with the current form of membership and RIPE. There are >> plenty of other ways (some of which have been proposed here) that are a >> much better idea (migrating to IPv6 being the ultimate one). >> >> -J >> >> >> >> Am Mittwoch, den 16.01.2019, 17:22 +0200 schrieb ivaylo: >>> Hello, >>> >>> I 100% agree with you ! >>> >>> As many resources one LIR consumes as bigger membership fee should >>> be. >>> >>> Even to better optimize resources usage, the fee can be calculated on >>> /24 >>> basis. >>> >>> example: >>> /17 = 128 x /24 >>> fee = (128-4)*350 = 43 400 euro/year fee >>> >>> >>> >>> P.S. in your example should be: (32-1)*1400 = 39 200 euro. >>> >>> Ivaylo Josifov >>> Varteh LTD >>> Varna Bulgaria >>> >>> On Wed, 16 Jan 2019, TrustHost wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> Hi. >>>> >>>> I think it would be great if the payment depends on the quantity >>>> the >>>> resources for one account. It would help to return unused IPv4 in >>>> free pool >>>> for new business. The companies, who really use big networks won't >>>> notice >>>> such changes. But who received the resources before 2012 and has >>>> unused /19 >>>> and maybe more will think if they really need such big blocks. >>>> >>>> For example we can implement the next charging scheme. >>>> If one account has more than /20 (not equivalent 4x/22 or the >>>> blocks were >>>> allocated before 2012) the next /22 ownership will cost some price >>>> (e.g. >>>> 1400 euro). >>>> >>>> For example: >>>> There is /17 IPv4 block for one LIR account. >>>> /17 = 32x/22. >>>> The total price for this account is (32-4)*1400 = 39 200 euro. >>>> >>>> I think the members must have equal rights, regardless of the year >>>> of the >>>> membership started. >>>> >>>> ------------------ >>>> Kind regards, >>>> Boris Loginov >>>> >>>> TrustHost LLC >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> members-discuss mailing list >>> members-discuss at ripe.net >>> https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss >>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/r >>> ipe%40probe-networks.de > > _______________________________________________ > members-discuss mailing list > members-discuss at ripe.net > https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss > Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/thomas%40niceblue.it -- -- Thomas Gallo @ Nice Blue s.r.l. Centro Direzionale Interporto Padova - Torre B Galleria Spagna, 35 - 35127 PADOVA (PD) Fixed phone: +39 (0)49 85 94 766 Fax line: +39 (0)49 82 51 032 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20190117/d2b6e3c0/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] New Charging Scheme
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] New Charging Scheme
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]