[members-discuss] New Charging Scheme

Hi,

On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 01:49:47PM +0200, ivaylo wrote:
> There are no doubts the future belongs to IPV6. But if we have no good 
> scheme to control resource usage, what guarantee us 10-15 years after 
> full ipv6 deploy we will be in same situation as now. Even the fact IPV6 
> have 65535^8 addresses if these resources are spilled unuzed and not 
> optimized will over again. What better control mechanism could be than 
> money ?

IPv6 utilization seems to be well under control.  The policies are working
nicely - every ISP and every end customer can have large amounts of IPv6
networks, but still we're only scratching on the first 1% of the
first 1/8 of the IPv6 address space (5 /12 out of 2000::/3 allocated to
RIRs, but by no means fully utilized).  

With most "really large" players already having "amazingly large" IPv6 
allocations.

The point about IPv6 is not "conserve! conserve!" but "use these nice
easily accessible masses of addresses and GO AND ROLL OUT IPv6!"

Gert Doering
        -- APWG chair
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                      Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14        Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                 HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444         USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20190117/5cfdd6f1/attachment.sig>