[members-discuss] New Charging Scheme

Hello

I think its good idea, and it will better if the charge is more as the
account has more addresses, exactly like income tax, this is fair and I
think it will make available address for accounts like me.

Thanks

On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 12:54 AM <ripe-lr at cidr.eu> wrote:

>
> That does not have anything to do with equal rights. All LIRs already have
> equal rights even if they use multiple LIR accounts.
>
> We already had that scheme and it was removed for good reason. RIPE NCC
> does not sell internet number resources and the effort for checking
> requests for IPv4 has gone due the one IPv4 /22 per LIR policy change. A
> change in favour of IPv4 is useless too, because IPv4 allocations are
> already done with the exception of allocations made from the old stock pool.
>
> We should not try to get back space the next one hundred years, especially
> not by using such methods, otherwise that will never end.
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* TrustHost <trusthostt at yandex.ru
> <http:///email/new/1/trusthostt%40yandex.ru>>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, 16. Jan 2019 – 14:16 CET +0100
> *To:* members-discuss at ripe.net
> <http:///email/new/1/members-discuss%40ripe.net>
>
> *Subject:* [members-discuss] New Charging Scheme
>
> Hi.
>
> I think it would be great if the payment depends on the quantity the
> resources for one account. It would help to return unused IPv4 in free pool
> for new business. The companies, who really use big networks won't notice
> such changes. But who received the resources before 2012 and has unused /19
> and maybe more will think if they really need such big blocks.
>
> For example we can implement the next charging scheme.
> If one account has more than /20 (not equivalent 4x/22 or the blocks were
> allocated before 2012) the next /22 ownership will cost some price (e.g.
> 1400 euro).
>
> For example:
> There is /17 IPv4 block for one LIR account.
> /17 = 32x/22.
> The total price for this account is (32-4)*1400 = 39 200 euro.
>
> I think the members must have equal rights, regardless of the year of the
> membership started.
>
> ------------------
> Kind regards,
> Boris Loginov
>
> TrustHost LLC
> _______________________________________________
> members-discuss mailing list
> members-discuss at ripe.net
> https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss
> Unsubscribe:
> https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/info%40together-pal.com
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20190117/7e54cc37/attachment.html>