[members-discuss] New Charging Scheme
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] New Charging Scheme
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] New Charging Scheme
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
ivaylo
ivaylo at bglans.net
Wed Jan 16 16:22:39 CET 2019
Hello, I 100% agree with you ! As many resources one LIR consumes as bigger membership fee should be. Even to better optimize resources usage, the fee can be calculated on /24 basis. example: /17 = 128 x /24 fee = (128-4)*350 = 43 400 euro/year fee P.S. in your example should be: (32-1)*1400 = 39 200 euro. Ivaylo Josifov Varteh LTD Varna Bulgaria On Wed, 16 Jan 2019, TrustHost wrote: > Hi. > > I think it would be great if the payment depends on the quantity the > resources for one account. It would help to return unused IPv4 in free pool > for new business. The companies, who really use big networks won't notice > such changes. But who received the resources before 2012 and has unused /19 > and maybe more will think if they really need such big blocks. > > For example we can implement the next charging scheme. > If one account has more than /20 (not equivalent 4x/22 or the blocks were > allocated before 2012) the next /22 ownership will cost some price (e.g. > 1400 euro). > > For example: > There is /17 IPv4 block for one LIR account. > /17 = 32x/22. > The total price for this account is (32-4)*1400 = 39 200 euro. > > I think the members must have equal rights, regardless of the year of the > membership started. > > ------------------ > Kind regards, > Boris Loginov > > TrustHost LLC > >
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] New Charging Scheme
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] New Charging Scheme
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]