[members-discuss] Feedback Requested: RIPE NCC Broker List
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Feedback Requested: RIPE NCC Broker List
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Feedback Requested: RIPE NCC Broker List
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Leo De Geer
ripe at shlab.se
Thu Dec 19 10:40:25 CET 2019
My Vote are for B Den 2019-12-19 kl. 10:37, skrev Schnabeltier: > Dear colleagues, > > I think we have three options. I would vote for option B: > > A) Keeping the list. > > B) We would consider it as important to have a list of reliable > brokers. The RIPE NCC would only publish information of brokers which > are verified. If the majority would vote for this option, we have to > find a solution how to verify the integrity of brokers. > > C) We do not consider a list of reliable brokers as important. While > RIPE NCC cannot or does not want to validate the integrity of brokers > at this moment, the list should be removed. > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > *From:* Christian Kaufmann <exec-board at ripe.net > </email/new/1/exec-board%40ripe.net>> > *Sent:* Thursday, 19. Dec 2019 – 10:17 CET +0100 > *To:* members-discuss at ripe.net </email/new/1/members-discuss%40ripe.net> > > *Subject:* [members-discuss] Feedback Requested: RIPE NCC Broker List > > Dear RIPE NCC members, > > The Executive Board has been following this discussion and we can see > general agreement for a change in the way brokers are listed on the RIPE > NCC's website. > > The question is whether the RIPE NCC should remove the list entirely, or > otherwise take steps to improve its approach. There are pros and cons > with both options. > > Removing the list is straightforward and would spare the RIPE NCC a few > headaches. However, it is worth considering whether the current model > provides some incentive for brokers to play by the rules and what might > happen if this incentive is gone. > > Conversely, it's clear that some brokers are still spamming RIPE > Database contacts. Is this the only problem we are seeking to eliminate > here, or are there others? Could an updated set of terms or a stricter > approach by the RIPE NCC help to mitigate this? > > Before the board makes its decision, we would like to hear your thoughts > on this list. > > Kind regards, > > Christian Kaufmann > RIPE NCC Executive Board Chairman > > _______________________________________________ > members-discuss mailing list > members-discuss at ripe.net > https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss > Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/ripe-member-discuss%40cidr.eu > > _______________________________________________ > members-discuss mailing list > members-discuss at ripe.net > https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss > Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/ripe%40shlab.se -- Vänliga hälsningar / Best regards Leo De Geer MikroTik Certified Consultant/Trainer MTCINE MTCRE MTCTCE MTCWE MTCNA MTCUME MTCIPv6E MTCSE MTCASE Tel +46 325 660 650 Fax +46 325 660 650 Web www.shlab.se e-mail ripe at shlab.se -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20191219/8b6a00c1/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Feedback Requested: RIPE NCC Broker List
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Feedback Requested: RIPE NCC Broker List
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]