[members-discuss] Regarding RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2020 - Two Options to Vote On

Hi,

On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 11:10:40PM +0300, Bunea TELECOM wrote:
> 
> > Why?  Because it creates incentives to return unused ASNs, unused
> > PI assignment (or sell them off), etc - instead of just having them
> > lie around, unused.  If you *need* something, 50 EUR is ok, but "just
> > to have it", it might be annoying enough to give it back.
> 
> No because it will charge the same for a /16 as for a /24. And it???s not fair that after you pay 4k euros for a /24 to pay 50 euros more yearly, unlike some older LIRs that paid next to nothing for a /20 let???s say. 

Life is not fair if you exhaust some common resource.  No matter how you
twist it, it will still not be fair.

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                      Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14        Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                 HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444         USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20190417/81644ab4/attachment.sig>