[members-discuss] Regarding RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2020 - Two Options to Vote On
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Regarding RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2020 - Two Options to Vote On
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Regarding RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2020 - Two Options to Vote On
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Bunea TELECOM
suport at bunea.eu
Wed Apr 17 22:10:40 CEST 2019
> Why? Because it creates incentives to return unused ASNs, unused > PI assignment (or sell them off), etc - instead of just having them > lie around, unused. If you *need* something, 50 EUR is ok, but "just > to have it", it might be annoying enough to give it back. No because it will charge the same for a /16 as for a /24. And it’s not fair that after you pay 4k euros for a /24 to pay 50 euros more yearly, unlike some older LIRs that paid next to nothing for a /20 let’s say. If we keep option B we might as well divide the LIRs into two separate types: pre-exaustion (have to pay the 50 euros) post-exaution (exempt from paying the 50 euros) Thanks — Petru Bunea / CEO suport at bunea.eu <mailto:suport at bunea.eu> / +40752481282 <tel:+40752481282> Bunea TELECOM / DATACENTER / APP DEVELOPMENT http://www.bunea.eu <http://www.bunea.eu/> / +40745495495 <tel:+40745495495> > On 17 Apr 2019, at 23:06, Gert Doering <gert at space.net> wrote: > > Hi, > > On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 10:42:15PM +0300, Andrejs Guba wrote: >> So i repeat. It will be interesting to listen to someone who can describe >> his logic in proposed scheme B. > > I didn't propose it, but I like scheme B. > > Why? Because it creates incentives to return unused ASNs, unused > PI assignment (or sell them off), etc - instead of just having them > lie around, unused. If you *need* something, 50 EUR is ok, but "just > to have it", it might be annoying enough to give it back. > > (I returned one of my ASNs when they did still cost money, back before > we changed the charging scheme last time - exactly because) > > Gert Doering > -- NetMaster > -- > have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? > > SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer > Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann > D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) > Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 > _______________________________________________ > members-discuss mailing list > members-discuss at ripe.net > https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss > Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/suport%40bunea.eu -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20190417/bfb4e05e/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: email-signature.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 2092 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20190417/bfb4e05e/attachment.jpg>
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Regarding RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2020 - Two Options to Vote On
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Regarding RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2020 - Two Options to Vote On
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]