[members-discuss] About IPv6 tunnels and other incentives
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] About IPv6 tunnels and other incentives
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Input from Membership on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Daniel Pearson
daniel at privatesystems.net
Fri Sep 23 14:25:37 CEST 2016
This right here would change the world in a year. While near impossible to actual accomplish, if it did happen you would never see a faster IPv6 deployment rate. +100! Daniel~ On 09/23/2016 04:35 AM, Nigel Titley wrote: > On 23/09/16 09:24, Anthony Somerset wrote: >> This sounds like the perfect idea though >> >> Lobby the main providers/generators of Internet Bandwidth usage to only >> support IPv6 on new tech/products - even if only for initial launch phases. >> >> For example Netflix is starting to do UHD/4k, wouldn’t it be great if we >> could get them and google and others to only offer 4k/UHD on V6 only for >> a period of time like 3-6 months or even longer. > With my Chairman's hat firmly to one side, I said a long time ago that > the best way to ensure IPv6 adoption was to make it a condition of the > issuing of the gtld that all .xxx sites were IPv6 only. > > Nigel > > ---- > If you don't want to receive emails from the RIPE NCC members-discuss > mailing list, please log in to your LIR Portal account and go to the general page: > https://lirportal.ripe.net/general/ > > Click on "Edit my LIR details", under "Subscribed Mailing Lists". From here, you can add or remove addresses.
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] About IPv6 tunnels and other incentives
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Input from Membership on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]