[members-discuss] Input from Membership on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model (fwd)
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Input from Membership on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model (fwd)
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Input from Membership on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model (fwd)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Teotónio Ricardo
teotonio.ricardo at webtuga.pt
Fri Sep 23 01:42:31 CEST 2016
That’s why i think there shouldn’t exist any IPv4 Transfer market. This should be disallowed by RIPE. If you don’t allow selling IPv4 and charge more for them, LIRs with a big percentage of unused IPv4 Allocations will start to return them and only keep what they really need to maintain their services until they fully migrate to IPv6. TEOTÓNIO RICARDO: Technical Support & Account Manager @ WebTuga, Lda. blog: blog.webtuga.pt - web: www.webtuga.pt - area de clientes: clientes.webtuga.pt twitter: @webtugahosting - facebook: fb.me/webtugahostingfb WebTuga - Soluções de Alojamento Cloud > No dia 23/09/2016, às 00:35, Simon Lockhart <s.lockhart at cablecomnetworking.co.uk> escreveu: > > On Thu Sep 22, 2016 at 11:15:30PM +0100, Teotonio Ricardo wrote: >> If they start being charged by allocation, they will think about returning >> resources they aren't using and prioritize implementation of IPv6. In my >> opinion, as a community member, LIRs should have the allocations they need, >> not the allocations they want. > > No, the won't they'd get more money by selling them on the open market, than > they would be reducing their RIPE fees. RIPE could never justifiably charge > more than the IPs were worth on the open market, so no one will ever return > them to RIPE. > > Simon -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20160923/2f0f2905/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Input from Membership on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model (fwd)
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Input from Membership on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model (fwd)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]