[members-discuss] Input from Membership on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Input from Membership on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Input from Membership on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Daniel Pearson
daniel at privatesystems.net
Fri Sep 16 13:37:17 CEST 2016
I don't necessarily mind the discussion, but It would be nice if people actually researched and put some fact in with their fiction. Only took me a few hours to review over RIPE's annual report and budget to determine that any fee structure changes wouldn't do a lick of good. On 09/15/2016 10:48 AM, Nigel Titley wrote: > On 15/09/16 12:41, Brandon Butterworth wrote: >> I'm not sure why RIPE initiated this discussion, it just rakes >> over old arguments that had no route to consensus > RIPE NCC initiated this discussion as a result of a recent previous > discussion on this list and as a result of a direct request to the > executive board. > > I'm afraid this is just an overhead of operating a member focused > organisation. > > Nigel > > ---- > If you don't want to receive emails from the RIPE NCC members-discuss > mailing list, please log in to your LIR Portal account and go to the general page: > https://lirportal.ripe.net/general/ > > Click on "Edit my LIR details", under "Subscribed Mailing Lists". From here, you can add or remove addresses.
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Input from Membership on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Input from Membership on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]