[members-discuss] Input from Membership on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Input from Membership on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Input from Membership on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Brandon Butterworth
hostmaster at bogons.net
Thu Sep 15 14:36:38 CEST 2016
On Thu Sep 15, 2016 at 01:02:39PM +0100, Sascha Luck [ml] wrote: > out of interest, how would a CS that charges members according to > the amount of resources affect a return of excess reserves, were > that to happen again? Would the amount to be returned have to be > calculated proportionally to the membership fee of the individual > member or would the return be the same for everyone like the last > time I expect they'd try and find a fair or reasonable method > - which amounts to a redistribution from larger to smaller > members? In no way is it ever that. When charges were not flat small ones never paid more than large and large ones have likely been members a long time so large have invested more in RIPE than small. If it's even then it's likely a redistribution from large to small, more so for the scammers joining for free with a legacy /29 they rented for a month brandon
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Input from Membership on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Input from Membership on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]