[members-discuss] IETF funding
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] IETF funding
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] IETF funding
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Dominik Nowacki
dominik at clouvider.co.uk
Fri May 27 10:23:58 CEST 2016
We pay the money so I suppose the ball is on our (membership) side. Kind Regards, Dom uk.clouvider -----Original Message----- From: members-discuss [mailto:members-discuss-bounces at ripe.net] On Behalf Of Radu-Adrian Feurdean Sent: 27 May 2016 09:20 To: Gert Doering <gert at space.net>; Peter Koch <koch at DENIC.DE> Cc: members-discuss at ripe.net Subject: Re: [members-discuss] IETF funding On Thu, May 26, 2016, at 09:24, Gert Doering wrote: > Supporting the IETF is good, with a yearly contribution to ISOC or > IETF directly. > > Transferring our reserves to their reserves, I fail to see the > compelling reason why this would be in our (RIPE) interest. Is this something that we (RIPE NCC membership) can decide on, or is it a decision more on IETF-side ? If it is up to us, I would go to "regular" contribution, leaving up to IETF to decide how to deal with it. -- Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN fr.ccs ---- If you don't want to receive emails from the RIPE NCC members-discuss mailing list, please log in to your LIR Portal account and go to the general page: https://lirportal.ripe.net/general/ Click on "Edit my LIR details", under "Subscribed Mailing Lists". From here, you can add or remove addresses.
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] IETF funding
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] IETF funding
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]