[members-discuss] Sign-up fee for additional LIR account
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Sign-up fee for additional LIR account
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Sign-up fee for additional LIR account
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Michal Biernacki
michal.biernacki at grupahexa.pl
Thu Jul 21 22:47:02 CEST 2016
> Wiadomość napisana przez Dmitriy Zemlyanoy <dmitriy at deltahost.com.ua> w dniu 21.07.2016, o godz. 22:29: > > If LIR want to get more IPs and don't to want pay for it - he don't really need it. > He just want to get as much IPs as he can get for keeping it in store. And trying to get maximum IPs at minimal cost. > > If you need IPs - you will pay for it. If you are not ready to pay for it - you don't need it. > That is how I see it. I agree with this part. In my opinion: LIR has a lot of IPs => LIR has a lot of customers or payed services => LIR earns more money That’s why I think that all LIRs have to pay fixed rate for each /24 block. If they really need them they will pay for it. If they are not ready to pay for it - they don’t use their IPs efficiently or they have too many blocks. I’m not writing about the price per /24 block. Just about general - and very simple - rule. Kind regards, Michal -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20160721/25cf8540/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Sign-up fee for additional LIR account
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Sign-up fee for additional LIR account
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]