[members-discuss] audit idea .... improve database quality

Hello,
> On 17.02.2016, at 22:56, Andrea Cocito <andrea.cocito at ifom.eu> wrote:
> 
> On 17 Feb 2016, at 17:20, Matthias Šubik <matthias.subik at ucnd.at> wrote:
>> I would suggest all LIRs, which obviously don’t know they are a LIR, and how to unsubscribe to be placed on the audit short list.
> 
> I second this, maybe “excess lameness” should be considered as a good reason for dropping LIR status and deallocating any allocated resource, with specific reference to IPv4 address space.

Had a good laugh on that one, but I would add bonus lameness brownie points for replying to any thread. 
But you can’t drop them. Next to lots of consulting firms two company names jumped out of the crowd, one is a large logistics brand, and another is a bank. 
I seriously think, that this LIRs got established a long time ago, and they are still using the original allocation, maybe without proper assignment in the DB. Maybe they got established by an external consultant when PI-Space was discontinued. 

So they are a LIR, they never used their IP address to the full extend (maybe one /24 for a handful of servers), and they have *no idea* about *IPv6*.

So they need help. ASAP.
That’s why they need an audit by RIPE NCC.

I wonder if security is handled on the same *level* there.

Matthias