[members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [news] RIPE NCC Members and Multiple LIR Accounts - Please Discuss
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [news] RIPE NCC Members and Multiple LIR Accounts - Please Discuss
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [news] RIPE NCC Members and Multiple LIR Accounts - Please Discuss
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
David Ponzone
david.ponzone at ipeva.fr
Thu Feb 18 13:17:59 CET 2016
2. I think that’s a bit extreme, but I get the idea. I would rather see it this way: If a LIR with a /22 merges with another LIR with a /22, it’s not reasonable to ask them to give it back as they are LIRs from similar size (or they can be asked to demonstrate that they need both). If a LIR with a /22 is bought by another LIR with a /19, it’s reasonable to « ask » them to give back the /22 in the next 6-12 months as they probably have the space left to renumber. The rule could be: if the biggest LIR has 4 or 8 times more address space than the smaller LIR, the smallest has to return address space under X months. Exception: if a LIR with several /16s or bigger merges with another similar-sized LIR, the whole thing should be audited in order to see how many address space they can return. David Ponzone Direction Technique email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr <mailto:david.ponzone at ipeva.fr> tel: 01 74 03 18 97 gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 Service Client IPeva tel: 0811 46 26 26 www.ipeva.fr <blocked::http://www.ipeva.fr/> - www.ipeva-studio.com <blocked::http://www.ipeva-studio.com/> Ce message et toutes les pièces jointes sont confidentiels et établis à l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autorisée est interdite. Tout message électronique est susceptible d'altération. IPeva décline toute responsabilité au titre de ce message s'il a été altéré, déformé ou falsifié. Si vous n'êtes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le détruire immédiatement et d'avertir l'expéditeur. > Le 17 févr. 2016 à 18:27, Gunnar Guðvarðarson <gunni at wave.is> a écrit : > > 1. Yes > 2. Make it so that any /22 allocated from "the last /8" is > non-transferrible if allocated after a specific date, ever. > > That way, if a LIR requests a /22 the subnet is bound to that LIR, if > the LIR then wants to merge with another company it must return the > /22. > > That way any abuse becomes a very expensive thing to maintain. > > And of course require a working IPv6 allocation before assigning > anything from IPv4. > > ---- > > Dear colleagues, > > The RIPE NCC Executive Board would like to ask the membership to discuss > the issue of RIPE NCC members opening additional LIR accounts. > > There were comments at the RIPE NCC General Meeting (GM) in November > 2015 that members having the ability to open additional LIR accounts, > each of which can request a /22 of IPv4 address space, may run against > the spirit of the last /8 policy. In light of this, the Board decided to > temporarily suspend the ability of RIPE NCC members to open additional > LIR accounts. > > The RIPE NCC began to allocate IPv4 address space from the last /8 > policy on 14 September 2012. Since that time the RIPE NCC has allocated > more than 8,600 /22s, yet there remains 0.94 of a /8 still in the pool. > > ACTION REQUIRED: > The Board asks the membership to provide their opinion on and discuss > the following points: > > 1. Is the activity of members opening additional LIR accounts a problem > that must be prevented? > > 2. If this activity is a problem that must be prevented, what action > should the RIPE NCC take to attempt its prevention? > > Statistics pertinent to this discussion are available in this article on > RIPE Labs: > https://labs.ripe.net/Members/laura_cobley/ripe-ncc-members-and-multiple-lir-accounts?pk_campaign=members&pk_kwd=list-ncc > > The Board asks that members discuss this issue on the Members Discuss > mailing list . > > The Board will monitor the discussion and will review it at the next > Executive Board Meeting on 31 March 2016. Depending on the outcome of > that meeting, the Board may propose a resolution for members to vote on > at the RIPE NCC General Meeting in May 2016. > > Best regards, > > Nigel Titley > RIPE NCC Executive Board > > ~ Gunnar > > ---- > If you don't want to receive emails from the RIPE NCC members-discuss > mailing list, please log in to your LIR Portal account and go to the general page: > https://lirportal.ripe.net/general/ > > Click on "Edit my LIR details", under "Subscribed Mailing Lists". From here, you can add or remove addresses. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20160218/e31875f1/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [news] RIPE NCC Members and Multiple LIR Accounts - Please Discuss
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [news] RIPE NCC Members and Multiple LIR Accounts - Please Discuss
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]