[members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [news] RIPE NCC Members and Multiple LIR Accounts
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [news] RIPE NCC Members and Multiple LIR Accounts
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [news] RIPE NCC Members and Multiple LIR Accounts
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Tim
tim at treestle.com
Fri Feb 12 14:52:17 CET 2016
I'm for opening the market up further, with inter-RIR sales between LIRs which (correct me if I'm wrong) is only possible currently with legacy resources through third-party IP brokers. If you want to reduce the price, increase the availability in through an open market. Over Regulation of inter-LIR sales will create a shortage. -Tim Note: I need more IP space, so it's not like I want to have to buy them, I'd love it if I could just claim more for free from RIPE, but that just isn't viable or fair. On 12/02/2016 14:43, Daniel Stolpe wrote: > > Oh my. I would like to think that in Poland you were done with > socialist economy. In Sweden we do have some tendencies in that > direction, most obvious when it comes to rental flats. And well, it > was not originally a socialist idea but a temporary rule during World > War II, just that nobody realised the war ended + 70 years ago. > > So what we have is regulated prices on rental flats. As a result there > is no money in building new houses and thus a shortage. If you want to > rent a flat you have to wait for 10-20 years. And because of the > shortage a rental contract has a "value" that you don't want to give > up. So we have a shortage *and* empty flats. And even though you are > not allowed to sell the contracts people still do (pretending to swap > flats, which is legal). > > In short - the idea might sound nice but it does not work. If holders > of unused IPv4 space are allowed to sell addresses on an open market, > chances are much bigger it will be used. If not, the holder will > probably keep it in case it will be needed in the future. And as with > the flats, peoble would still sell them, but probably not update the > registry and then we have other, serious problems. > > So even if it seems unfair that early adopters can make money from > something they once got more or less for free, the alternatives are > less tempting. > > Cheers, > > Daniel > > On Fri, 12 Feb 2016, Dariusz Siedlecki wrote: > >> Witam, >> >> I agree 100% with this opinion. >> >> It should be prohibited to sell/buy address space between two LIR >> (not /22 also olders assignments). >> It should be some solidarity or prices should be regulated by RIPE >> not by market. >> >> Now companies who have lot of IPv4 are against any changes. >> New companies have tied hands. >> And RIPE is in the middle. >> >> But they all pay the same fee. >> >> Best regards >> Dariusz >> >> >>> On 12/02/2016 09:34, Kurt Jaeger wrote: >>> > No, seriously: use IPv6. >>> Most of my customers have IPv6. >>> Sadly, the rest of the do not >>> >>> On 12/02/2016 11:59, Dominik Nowacki wrote: >>> > This, or CG NAT. 1 village / end point / 1-2 IPs and CG NAT for >>> the > whole village + /56 IPv6 per household. >>> Is really CGNAT the RIPE-NCC solution for ipv4 exhaustion ? >>> As a network engineer, and as a customer, CGNAT look like the worst >>> solution. >>> >>> >>> To answer the talk from Gert and other, about the holy mission of the >>> RIPE, I agree with them, somehow. >>> The RIPE is supposed to show justice, right ? Equality ? Good not >>> evil ? >>> >>> Let's reap all useless IPv4. >>> You want to sell IPv4 ? Obviously, you do not need that subnet. >>> You do not announce that subnet over the internet ? Reaped. >>> You want to transfert that subnet between two obviously not related >>> compagny ? Reaped. >>> >>> As the Protector of the weaks, and to preserve viability of the >>> newcommers, the RIPE-NCC *must not* allow people to make business >>> on the >>> back of the new. >>> IPv4 are a resource of common interest, not a plot of land that can be >>> sell to the richer. >>> >>> Do not you think ? >>> >> >> >> ---- >> If you don't want to receive emails from the RIPE NCC members-discuss >> mailing list, please log in to your LIR Portal account and go to the >> general page: >> https://lirportal.ripe.net/general/ >> >> Click on "Edit my LIR details", under "Subscribed Mailing Lists". >> From here, you can add or remove addresses. > > _________________________________________________________________________________ > > Daniel Stolpe Tel: 08 - 688 11 81 stolpe at resilans.se > Resilans AB Fax: 08 - 55 00 21 63 http://www.resilans.se/ > Box 45 094 556741-1193 > 104 30 Stockholm > > > ---- > If you don't want to receive emails from the RIPE NCC members-discuss > mailing list, please log in to your LIR Portal account and go to the > general page: > https://lirportal.ripe.net/general/ > > Click on "Edit my LIR details", under "Subscribed Mailing Lists". From > here, you can add or remove addresses.
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [news] RIPE NCC Members and Multiple LIR Accounts
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [news] RIPE NCC Members and Multiple LIR Accounts
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]