[members-discuss] Dealing with automated ticket system replies
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Dealing with automated ticket system replies
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] remove automated ticket system reply from member discussion list
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Daniel Stolpe
stolpe at resilans.se
Mon Jun 16 12:54:01 CEST 2014
Well, this way, or even rather the APWG way. As long as we get rid of them, I am in favour. On Fri, 13 Jun 2014, Serge Radovcic wrote: > Hello all humans out there that are reading this mail, > > I want to say that I feel your pain as I too have to deal with all these > ticket system replies on a daily basis and would also like to tackle > this issue. > > I would rather not un-subscribe email addresses without first gaining > permission. > > Furthermore, the email addresses subscribed to the 'members-discuss' > mailing list are the ones LIRs configure in the LIR Portal. > > Unfortunately, sometimes emails sent to the members-discuss list are > forwarded internally to other addresses ? such as in the case of > ticketing systems or role emails ? and those are the ones sending the > automated replies. > > We can look for similar domains in the list of subscribers, but we might > not find an exact match with the sending email (which can be something > like 'noreply at example.com'). In that case, we can't be confident that we > are un-subscribing the correct address. > > In order to be successful, we'll have to contact the companies in > question and find out the chains of redirects that lead to the problem > in order to get them fixed/removed from the LIR Portal subscriptions. > > Over the past year or so, and due to our team's efforts, we reduced the > amount of automated ticket responses from more than well over 100 to > about 30 or so that we still get today. Which isn't too bad considering > some 3,015 email addresses are subscribed to this list, but I agree that > zero would be the ultimate goal! > > I am more than happy to go after those that are remaining (which I am > about to receive an updated list of after hitting "Send") to reduce this > amount even further if possible. > > And for those of you that are behind these ticket systems and are > actually reading this thread, can you provide an alternative email > address that will not produce an automated ticket response. Here is the > URL that will explain how you can do this: > > https://www.ripe.net/lir-services/member-support/info/membership-mailing-lists/subscribing-to-members-discuss > > Here's looking forward to a more human mailing list! > > Take care, > > Serge Radovcic > Chief Communications Officer > RIPE NCC > > > ---- > If you don't want to receive emails from the RIPE NCC members-discuss > mailing list, please log in to your LIR Portal account and go to the general page: > https://lirportal.ripe.net/general/ > > Click on "Edit my LIR details", under "Subscribed Mailing Lists". From here, you can add or remove addresses. > > mvh Daniel Stolpe _________________________________________________________________________________ Daniel Stolpe Tel: 08 - 688 11 81 stolpe at resilans.se Resilans AB Fax: 08 - 55 00 21 63 http://www.resilans.se/ Box 45 094 556741-1193 104 30 Stockholm
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Dealing with automated ticket system replies
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] remove automated ticket system reply from member discussion list
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]